Hi, I noticed that the original O2 had been deleted and replaced by the new POI. However some information was dropped in the process: the opening hours and business type. Also, the new position was not as accurate as the original position as surveyed. It is best to just modify an existing POI to add information instead of deleting and creating a new one. This has been reverted in changeset/45214545

Hi, has this section of railroad out to San Jon been rebuilt now? It had previously been abandoned. Thanks,

Hi, has this import been reviewed by the process in osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Thanks,

Hi - question about the 'Tunnel Hill State Trail'; this was changed from railway=abandoned to railway=rail . Are there actually rails present along this section of trail?

Hi, thank you for the edits. I had originally used the "Cook-out" form with a dash because that is used consistently on signage and the web site.

I suppose the dash makes it harder to search though; people will search for CookOut or "Cook Out".

Hi, thank you for the edits! Keep in mind that changing from a pedestrian street to monument will block routing apps from finding a path through the area. I have no strong opinion, but consider 'historic=memorial' together with highway=pedestrian / area=yes

Hi, Welcome to OSM and thank you for the updates! The best road type for driveway or parking lots is type "Service" , then select driveway, alley , or parking aisle. That will keep routing apps from sending cars across parking lots. Sam Clayton Blvd is fine as 'Unclassified' because the speed limit should keep routing apps from using it as a cut-through.

Hi, Thank you for the fix. White Horse Road Extension is mostly 2 lanes, with only a tiny part with a left turn lane.

Also, some of the turn:lanes:forward tag is blank, which does not match the turn lane tagging in Wiki

Hi, thank you for the fix. It seems that using a blank for the turn lane is not valid. See the normal usages at turn:lanes=* (the word 'none' is fully spelled out for special cases, but does not mean that no text is required )

Ok, I understand. I believe you have already corrected the Jesup<>Ludowici problem because it works today on the OpenStreetMap site. It should show in the next Mapfactor update.

I had coincidentally edited a number of streets near Musgrove St on April 6 for the Corporate Center Drive opening. I recall an abnormality at the Smallwood intersection that I had corrected. The routing on the Openstreetmap.org site doesn't work today because it's using yesterday's data without the highway tag. It should be corrected tomorrow, and the next MapFactor update after that should route correctly between the 2 areas.

Feel free to continue to correct the Mapfactor routing problems in OpenStreetMap, but if the problem isn't clear, feel free to leave a note. I watch the Upstate SC region and will look at it within a day or so. Best Regards.

Hi, since there are 3 major map providers, it partly depends on which GPS device you are using. Is it a Garmin, or an app on your smartphone? If it's an app, which one is it?

Hi, thank you for the corrections. I don't understand the change - neither of these roads were marked as One Way previously. Also, the highway tag for State Highway 56 was removed.

Sorry, my bad. I confused which was the latest version. I think the new tag you set is the correct one. Thank you.

What was the reason for this change? The previous relation route=railway (collection of railroad ways) sounds more applicable than the new route=train (train services), since this is an abandoned railway.

Hi, thank you for these improvements. I am a bit confused by some of the edits on Enterprise Boulevard - a section has been 'join'ed to another section that causes a bus route to extend into the new section, and there some new splits on that road.

The ID editor has allowed this type of join in the past without warning, but I think they have a fix for it soon.

Hi, I also found that this changeset moved more than 35,000 nodes. What was the reference used in moving those nodes? Thank you

Many thanks - this has happened for several people during the challenge!

Hi, thank you for the fix for alignment. One new problem with many people editing rail crossings is that some people have changed alignments at their crossing only. So the result is that while some parts of the rail is aligned, other parts are off. It will be best to review the entire length of ways way/367380551 and way/261333389 to correct the problem.

That area does not meet the definition of 'unclassified' in the Wiki, nor its common usage in North America (Roughly equivalent to 'residential' but without residences). Specifically it is no longer a public road, it is all on private land. I researched the public record before deleting it originally. Please take a look at the road today and see how you would classify it -

https://www.flickr.com/photos/43161130@N05/albums/72157657343510889/with/20885800705/

There is no smooth entrance onto the former surface from the parking lot https://www.flickr.com/photos/43161130@N05/20885800705/in/album-72157657343510889/

The asphalt has all been removed, and only sand, gravel, grass, and weeds remain.

While I suppose a 'motor car' could still pass, it would generally only be passable by a maintenance vehicle with plenty of ground clearance.

One thing that will help - if the TIGER:reviewed flag has been removed, do not modify that road back to old TIGER because someone local has already worked with it.