Najlepiej by usunąć nazwy z obszarów water=river (i przypilnowaniu by były na liniach)

Ideally, names wuld be also removed from water areas

Ideally, names wuld be also removed from water areas

re node/9231349072

Is it added based on just note/2351205 ?

Or have you verified situation somehow?

Sorry for edit fragmentation :(

In future I will try to check is it some larger problem before diting one by one

Zerkniesz na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=845750#p845750 ? Jest wątpliwość co do usuwani imion

Osmose being buggy is not a valid reason for changing tagging.

"CPR (path with bicycle and foot designated) will never be a highway=footway or a highway=cycleway, which is why the footway tag is misleading."

"ciąg pieszo-rowerowy" (bicycle=designated foot=designated segregated=no) along road IS also a sidewalk, therefore footway=sidewalk is not misleading

Also, combined footway + cycleway with segregated=yes can also be sidewalk, such as https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/899988/53487084-db42d980-3a8a-11e9-910a-2c39ae6dbcbf.png

> This one too shouldn't have a footway=sidewalk because it's path (bicycle-foot) based on "path" tag, not "footway".

You are wrong, highway=path (and for example highway=construction) also may have footway=sidewalk or footway=crossing

Podobnie way/766505194/history - czy to na pewno jest wybudowane? Z tego co wiem to nie.

W szczególności, czy way/204689864/history jest na pewno już zbudowana i otwarta?

Czym motywowana jest zmiana klasy drogi ( way/951618094/history )?

Proszę zobacz też osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Co chciałeś/chciałeś w tej edycji osiągnąć? Zobacz proszę osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Hello! Thanks for mapping but it would be a bit better to use more meaningful edit descriptions.

See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hello! Thanks for mapping but it would be a bit better to use more meaningful edit descriptions.

See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

node/7624077403/history - is this info applying to the entire way/816327430 ?

Link to quite extensive discussion on OSM US Slack about this edit: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1634910118008500

I think that right now you need an account that can be created at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

This edit was discussed on changeset/112831483 (just leaving link as repeating discussion would not be useful)

> Documentation is here: osm.wiki/LINZ

crevasses are not even mentioned there

Which specific import on imports mailing list proposed mass importing of temporary things like way/983735309 and crevasses?

Are you sure that node/1930266572/history actually represents actually existing alpine hut? This seems very, very, very dubious. See tourism=alpine%20hut?uselang=en