> I don't know when crevasse-cl was discussed and natural=crevasse was decided

In such case I am considering to revert it as an undicussed, undocumented and low quality import

See for example https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2021-October/006716.html that pointed out that data quality in this import is really low

See say
osm.org/#map=13/-77.6183/162.8670&layers=D

If this import actually was discussed as required (on Imports mailing list) and documented as required (OSM Wiki page) please add this info in changeset comment here.

Note that something described "LINZ Address Import 1.1.1" really should not include antarctic crevasses.

Dzięki za mapowanie tutaj, przydało się to dzisiaj podczas spaceru!

Where this import of antarctic crevasses was discussed?

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org//search?q=recycling%3Adrugs is used just 312 times so it is not even so dominant

Every tag and namespace was created at some point.

"tag X is not used elsewhere" is not a valid reason for retagging if some info would be lost

And popularity of some misleading tagging is not really sufficient to justify autromated retagging

Note that this specific map shows not only actually named objects, but also is using labels for indicating type of object.

Note "PARKING" label

For greenhouse in fact I already removed the label.

In general things like name=Garage on bilding=garage in OSM are unwanted descriptive names, in exactly the same way as name=Tree natural=tree is a bad idea.

In some context map of park may label species of trees, this does not mean that in OSM putting that into name tag would be a good idea.

This medicines are not recycled. And changing

trash_accepted:medicines

to

recycling:medicines

as medicines are extremely unlikely to be recycled

This edit was reverted.

Please, do not make remote edits like this where it is likely that you damage data.

On what you base your claim that this medicines are recycled?

Why you made this edit? This medicines are not recycled.

Please do not make edits that reduce quality of OSM data.

node/9190588426

motor_vehicle=destination? That would mean that trucks and cars that are not using this road as shortcut can pass through this bollard. Is it accurate?

Dzięki za poprzerabianie moich uwag!

Proszę, opisuj swoje edycje. Zobacz osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

If gnome-maps is not displaying brand:wikidata and brand:wikipedia fields then

- it may be a good idea to report problem to authors (is gnome-maps still being developed)
- limit adding Wikipedia to cases where it is specifically about given object (say, about a specific statue or specific building or specific tree - not about tree species or about a brand)

Hello and welcome!

Hi! Individual trees are marked as trees, not as woods.

See say ttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9178797758/history

Dzięki za mapowanie szlaków! Wczoraj się przydały na przejażdżce rowerowej.

Dzięki za mapowanie tego szlaku! Wczoraj się przydał na przejażdżce rowerowej.

Dzięki za mapowanie tego szlaku! Wczoraj się przydał na przejażdżce rowerowej.

way/762645109/history i liczne inne przepusty są

- niewidoczne na Geoportalu
- fikcyjne, tam są mosty nie przypusty

Lepiej by był błąd wykrywalny przez walidator niż błędne dane niewykrywalne przez walidator

(kilka poprawiłem ostatnio)

Zmiana node/2653713770/history na Czrtowiec to pomyłka była, prawda?