OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
110360234 over 4 years ago

na podstawie note/2823658#map=19/51.14165/17.08240&layers=N

104607365 over 4 years ago

> A is a county level town with 2000K people, B is a prefecture level city with 300K people, which should be prefered?

OSM tags should reflect reality, not make decisions what should be shown on a map.

This kind of decisions should be made during map generation and not by mappers.

It is like deleting actually existing roads "because it looks ugly on a map".

At least in this case this population data is imported anyway, so it is not some huge loss.

104607365 over 4 years ago

> You only removed!

It is untrue, this edit for example added

population=16700

to

node/244080420/history

As I am not a part of a local community I will not revert, but I want to express that removal of a correct data is widely considered as a damaging.

Even if it improves display in some specific renderer.

see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

110283279 over 4 years ago

note that this edit removes population tag

as far as I see it is removal of correct data done as part incorrect tagging for the renderer

As I am not a part of a local community I will not revert, but I want to express that it is widely considered as a damaging

see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

104607365 over 4 years ago

> because they will think osmcarto do wrong render by population.

this is not a valid reason to remove correct tags, such as population tags

> If you still think "do not tag for render" is strict and can't violate by anyway, at any situation,

Yes, also when you really disagree with rendering

24853406 over 4 years ago

Jesś pewien że droga "Przez wieś" ma taką nadaną nazwę?

Czy to opisowa nazwa tej ulicy która nazwy nie ma?

44145059 over 4 years ago

way/246039927/history - czy ta droga ma nadaną nazwę "Piaski "Do Kasprzaka""?

Jak nie - to skąd ona się wzięła?

107913139 over 4 years ago

no to otwieram

107913139 over 4 years ago

ten access=no jest aktualny?

109772587 over 4 years ago

Are you sure that you surveyed this locations?

Some people sadly misuse StreetComplete for mapping places they never even visited or have only vague outdated memory about them.

109974803 over 4 years ago

> The same goes for StreetComplete.

Note that StreetComplete is supposed to be only for in-person survey

109751631 over 4 years ago

In such case sorry for bothering you!

Some people sadly misuse StreetComplete for mapping places they never even visited or have only vague outdated memory about them.

109801739 over 4 years ago

Nie rozumiem co przejezdność ulicy ma do tej edycji

110154660 over 4 years ago

poszło w changeset/110154660 changeset/110154910 changeset/110155316

110154910 over 4 years ago

poszło w changeset/110154660 changeset/110154910 changeset/110155316

110155316 over 4 years ago

poszło w changeset/110154660 changeset/110154910 changeset/110155316

106392168 over 4 years ago

Great that this is fixed (not sure are you on talk-gb list but it was mentioned there).

Well, I can just say that I predicted this :) See https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6517

106392168 over 4 years ago

Have you surveyed way/156856852/history ?

Or have you added shop tags based on just name match (despite it can be an office or closed shop - and this one is very likely closed)

110032644 over 4 years ago

Dzięki!

109645578 over 4 years ago

Note that for tree genus/species wikidata tag in incorrect

species:wikidata and genus:wikidata should be used - see species:wikidata=* genus:wikidata=*

wikidata tag is for linking wikidata entry about some specific tree (most trees have no such matching entries)