OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
110881337 over 4 years ago

I want to repeat that large scale reclassifying of roads is one of the worst ways to start OSM editing.

It is tricky, involves many editors, road classification in an incosistent mess (mostly due to fact that real world road classification is messy in many ways). And here consistency is especially nice.

> here are quite a lot of roads tagged as 'trunk' that are single lane, single carriageways, with 30mph limits and multiple roundabout

So?

highway=trunk can be even unpaved road - it is not based on physical characteristic

> I wouldn't steam into a country and start reclassifying their roads willy-nilly.

I wouldn't do even in area where I am highly active editor

110881337 over 4 years ago

> extensive vandalism

I would reserve it to cases where someone was malicious or not caring at all about OSM data quality, not where someone tried to improve things but did an opposite thing

110881337 over 4 years ago

> This is caused by a difference in OSM terminology and UK terminology.

In such unfortunate case, please follow OSM terminology

110421818 over 4 years ago

Jesteś pewien że way/977579858 wybudowana została?

99829496 over 4 years ago

that is not a problem - multipolygons are a standard tool for that

I can edit that - where vegetation ends? Probably a bit before Parthenon, it is not reaching area mapped as building=* here

89103973 over 4 years ago

Are you sure that node/7464707712/history is a restaurant, not a fast food?

99829496 over 4 years ago

Also inside the Parthenon itself?

99829496 over 4 years ago

I meant that for example way/910010284 is wrong and other heath on top of acropolis seems suspicious to me - from what I remember nothing like that was growing on hilltop

99829496 over 4 years ago

Hello! I am pretty sure that say note/2848544 is wrong - Partheon nowadays is not overgrown with heath

110481716 over 4 years ago

Why you deleted several objects without any explanation?

107312523 over 4 years ago

See note/2833032#map=17/37.97712/23.72809&layers=N

107312523 over 4 years ago

Note that you deleted POIs such as restaurants, cafes and shops such as node/3942491571/history

Why?

110413903 over 4 years ago

It was reported in https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/3244 but situation is not really clear to me

Why exactly removal of source=BAG is wrong here?

110471275 over 4 years ago

see also note/2828282

109767128 over 4 years ago

See https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/3222

Each available startegy has some issues, current one leads to overtagging where both cycleway part and footway part has the same surface.

Sadly some people set surface to specific value (of cycleway part) even if footway part has a different surface, this happens quite often (5%? 10%?).

The question is whether fixing this cases is worth overtagging in other cases.

107165208 over 4 years ago

note/2826472 - zerkniesz na to? Nie wiem co tu się stało.

Może łączyłeś punkty adresowe z budynkami?

Trafłem na to przy szykowaniu osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/retag_addr:postcode_to_postal_code_where_needed_(in_Poland)

97726237 over 4 years ago

Dzięki wielkie!

97726237 over 4 years ago

note/2822902#map=18/54.38449/19.44794&layers=N - i inne pobliskie można by też przejrzeć (ja teraz spać idę :) )

97726237 over 4 years ago

note/2823232 i inne podają że zaimportowano tu niestniejące budynki

84523160 over 4 years ago

way/589314372/history - na pewno tu asfalt jest?