way/977416640/history - skąd info że jest tam taka droga dla rowerów?

@HaPe-CZ Please restore valid service tags you removed

For example at way/51269872/history

Jak ta budowa rzeczywiście istnieje to odpowiedz w note/3174643 (chciałem im dać znać by historie edycji se sprawdzili, ale by to nie pomogło bo nie ma rzeczywistego źródła)

Jakie jest źródło tej edycji? Bo tej budowy na geoportalu jeszcze nie ma

note that linked wiki:symbol file upload was malformed - see osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=File:Sport_vlaanderen_skeeler_route_aanduiding_blauw.svg&action=edit&redlink=1

There is https://www.boreduplander.club/shop subpage but it shows an error message right now.

Where https://www.boreduplander.club/ website mentions this specific shop?

It seems not doing this at all, in such case it should be removed.

Also, what exactly can passerby buy at this location? shop=yes you used is hopelessly generic.

way/641833773 - what is source for that object that can be verified? Is it still seriously planned?

Skąd wiesz że node/9227870838/history nie istnieje?

note, way/457345051/history and many other remain unfixed

Zerkniesz na note/3166360 ? Podobno wróciła

And in some cases other service tags should be restored, see changeset/120183073

See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1idC for potentially problematic data (note that service=spur should be added only to spurs, and not added to railway track which are not spurs)

See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1idC for potentially problematic data (note that service=spur should be added only to spurs, and not added to railway track which are not spurs)

Thanks! Note that similar fix should be applied to all other spurs where you removed service=spur

@HaPe-CZ

Noone complainst about adding usage=industrial

Problem is with REMOVING service=spur

service=spur does not mark place as an amusement park

In addition, usage=industrial applies not only to spurs but also to some main lines.

> Relatively short lengths of track, built to give one company or entity access to the main line, normally for freight-only use.

is matching this case, therefore service=spur was correct, therefore removal of service=spur damaged data

please fix it

> this is an industrial railway (maybe shorter) but still this is not the whole station

service=spur can apply also in such cases

See service=spur

"this is industrial railway" is not a valid reason to remove correct service tag

why you removed them?

> this is an industrial railway (maybe shorter) but still this is not the whole station

Can you clarify? I am not understanding at all how it is related to removal of valid service=spur