way/1061486843

Dodane były w changeset/72163711 przez nową osobę

way/1018752726/history has multiple speed limits mapped at once.

What you tried to express with such mapping?

The problem is not with a tag, the problem is that area and shape you mapped is not matching real shape at all.

If you wanted to map location of residential landuse than landuse nodes can be used.

But if you use areas - do not create circular blobs.

This just makes proper mapping harder to do and new mappers may be discouraged by need to cleanup before mapping can be started - or discouraged by low data quality.

It is even worse than a blank map.

Please also cleanup ones that you added

Please, do not add fake areas mismatching reality which just make harder to map such as way/999594915

Is building:level intentional?

Have you meant building:levels?

See building:level=*?uselang=en-GB

Hey, please see way/709180434/history - something went wrong with the import

> less stress on the database

This is an utterly irrelevant issue that does not matter at all here.

Example of broken data: relation/14147872

Also, what is the license of data you imported?

Are you aware of osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

(this applies to shops in general)

Also, shop=outpost has a specific meaning: shop=outpost

If something cannot be visited by public, then it is not a shop=outpost

If you know that entering this road is prohibited to all except owner - add access=private

> Being a private area and being on the road, it is not necessary to map it

Nevertheless mapping such roads is OK - and deleting them is NOT acceptable

@Guvani Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments and follow it

In other words: everything indicates that you are copying from Google Maps to profit from some NFT scam.

This is not welcome at all.

Proszę, zerknij na note/3181844 i popraw fikcyjne budynki zgodnie z obietnicą

Zerkniesz na node/7691231250 i note/3177640 ?

Dalej to istnieje?

Dzięki za poprawkę!

Zerkniesz na note/3175749#map=19/50.55943/19.53920 ?