Mashin's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
104712787	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104712858	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104712955	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713154	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713230	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713294	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713389	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713425	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713462	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713552	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713667	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713739	over 4 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
95774447	over 4 years ago	Thanks!
95774447	over 4 years ago	It's part of conflation with the pre-existing data. I don't remember particularly about the station, but isn't that building the station itself?
104699786	over 4 years ago	Thanks for helping to improve CT! Just please don't delete building parts.
102754566	over 4 years ago	If you think that it is better on the building outline then you can go ahead and do the change. also.. conflation plugin for JOSM should handle that pretty easy.
102754566	over 4 years ago	When there are multiple addresses for one building they have to be on nodes and this way it looks more consistent (and easier to spot problems). But if people want to later put them on the building polygon or entrance node they can do that.
100710888	over 4 years ago	Hi MapleExplorer, thanks for your edits, but did you get a permission from the author of the map to use it for adding features to OSM? Also, what happened to the paths? many have unrealistically sharp angles or are not connected to anything else.
102150599	over 4 years ago	Hi bevalim, Thanks for adding all that useful information. Would you mind including source of the data in your changesets. When it comes to copyright we like to avoid potential future problems. Thanks
101515557	almost 5 years ago	Hey Kevin, historic=ruins is more for significant historic structures like castles. In this case abandoned:man_made=watermill is more appropriate. Also "Mill Ruins" is too generic, do they have names?