LightAsAFeather's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 143522639 | about 2 years ago | Moi, ja kiitos kartoitukseen osallistumisesta! Pikkuvirheitä tossa tosiaan oli. Kaikkea infoa ei ole tarkoitus laittaa name-avaimeen vaan informaation murusille on omat avaimensa. Esim. level:ref kerrokselle tässä tapauksessa. Niitä voi tutkiskella wikistä: shop=massage Tein korjaukset jo, eli sun ei tartte tehdä mitään tähän hätään.
|
| 140656156 | about 2 years ago | Let's just stick to English for general accessibility.
Many renderers will also ignore units.
|
| 140656156 | about 2 years ago | Hey! You moved the letters from housenumber tags to units. The way I read the wiki, this is incorrect. addr:housenumber=*
addr:*=*#Detailed_subkeys
|
| 141061089 | about 2 years ago | Hey, and thanks for the contribution! A small note about the operator tag: It should contain just the name of the operator, not the website. There's a subkey for that: operator:website=* So I would suggest the following changes: operator=Turku
|
| 141202733 | about 2 years ago | Hey, and thanks for contributing to OSM! I don't know this place personally, but judging by the name I wonder if shop=yes is appropriate here. There is an office tag also: osm.wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dassociation So maybe could be tagged like this: -shop=yes
|
| 131762040 | over 2 years ago | Hey! FYI the opening_hours key has a strict format: opening_hours=*
I fixed it for you here. |
| 13006670 | over 2 years ago | Hey! Can you still find a source for the boundary=protected_area around Pullin Kartano? |
| 135506493 | over 2 years ago | alt_name Rankkari was duplicated.
|
| 132520063 | almost 3 years ago | I'm aware that the Name Suggestion Index will produce warnings of this, but adding "brand not K-Market" is not the answer, as that's clearly not what's on the ground. The right way to go about this would be to change NSI, as this affects pretty much every K-Market in Finland. The problematic line appears to be this one: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/128442a48c3a52aafae44cd1f4b89fdc65406415/data/brands/shop/convenience.json#L1934 Maybe we should start a thread about this somewhere more public? |
| 75835711 | almost 3 years ago | These boundary:protected_area tags on buildings are generating a lot of Osmose warnings, as the tag is intended for national parks and such. (boundary=protected_area) Maybe the heritage=* tag would be the way to go? (heritage=*#Case:_a_single_object_e.g._a_building_is_under_protection) Though it doesn't appear to be quite as simple as tagging things heritage. There's sources etc. |