In cases where a place=* represents an administrative village (行政村) division rather than a physical settlement, the character '村' should be retained in the name, though whether to retain such place=* feature remains a matter of debate.
In contrast, natural villages are physical settlements rather than administrative divisions. Village naming conventions vary by region, source, and individual preference. Some users consistently append '村' to all village names, while others omit it. Practices for signage also differ: some include the '村' suffix to indicate the place type, others exclude it, and some use the '自然村' (natural village) suffix instead.
When specifying the address of a natural village, the associated administrative village may be referenced to clarify its location, using formats such as 'XX村YY自然村', 'XX行政村YY村', or simply 'XX村YY'. From this perspective, not adding the additional character seems to allow for more flexibility in handling. Additionally, the Chinese name subkey should always align with the name=* tag, regardless of the convention used.

Please note that single-character place names feel unnatural in modern Chinese, so the '村' in two-character place names should not be omitted.

光看图理解错了，似乎找不到关于此路的命名?

Have you ever looked at the satellite image during the so-called fix? There are three islands connected into one and the names of each island are retained. Any of the place=island as inner is incorrect.

Since there are some additional language tag fixes in this changeset, I thought my last comment was no longer appropriate. Now it seems better to write down the main changes, even if the description doesn't fully cover them.

Since this changeset involves a change to France, it will inevitably cover the world.

Yes, this is a ginkgo tree about 1100 years old, but thanks for the reminder because it should be written as start_date=0900 according to ISO 8601.

They are stop positions at the same vertical location in a group of stacked island platform. This is intentional.

This edit in Shandong involves the boundary of China, so the bounding box inevitably covers the whole of China.

?哪来的巢湖站

https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/ 影像可见110kV升压站位置，Google地图亦有更清晰卫星影像。

江永与恭城两风电场均名燕子山，由于无法确定风机所属，暂未拆分。您所绘制110kV燕子山升压站及部分风机位置并不在真实位置，相连35kV线路亦然。若您有可靠来源请根据实际情况更正，若无不建议盲画。

您好，
highway=motorway_junction的name应该填写互通名称，该出口通往的目的地及道路编号应在匝道的destination及destination:ref填写，望周知。详见：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction

wiki部分内容仅有单个编者编写而所涉甚广，难免有不妥之处，敬请关注后续变动。关于划分标准，欢迎在osm.wiki/Talk:China#place=*_%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88 发表您的看法。
群内讨论宜整理各方观点（若有）后发布于wiki讨论页以便作为标准制定之参考。

城市或城镇的一部分应为suburb，town宜用于独立城镇

This administrative unit does not nominally belong to Baoshan District but is actually under the jurisdiction of Baoshan District.

Can you speak English? Your machine-translated Chinese is incomprehensible.
Satellite imagery does not reflect reality, it is just a record of history. The Bing satellite imagery here was taken circa 2009, which is a far cry from reality. You can simply switch to Maxar satellite imagery (taken in 2021 or later) to see the change. If you ignore changes in reality, add features that no longer exist, and delete newly constructed features, your actions will be considered vandalism.

Be careful when you see features that don't exist on satellite images, satellite images are often out of date and your edits based on outdated satellite images are wrong. This changeset will be reverted.

4级渲染城市的门槛似乎是100万人，拉萨人口过少因而不渲染。同时因为空间有限，若人口更多的城市遮挡了附近城市的位置，或是附近空间不足以容纳相邻的城市则只能跳过这个城市，转而渲染空间足够而人口更少的城市。

osm-carto并不渲染place=state节点，省名是基于行政区关联生成的。武汉消失是被改了标签，南京消失则是被某位用户删除了，与此无关。