osm.wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23006_-_Choose_of_a_wrong_tag

Ok but then the "shape" shall have tags, otherwise it means nothing. I assume you draw it from an existing real feature, so I'm sure there is a way to tag it, even with a note or fixme only. I don't want to delete it but I know there are bots/people which may delete it, so the best is probably to tag it if it's a real object in order to save it.

Hi, way/456578120 has no tag. Can you please fix this issue?

Moreover I wonder if maxspeed="DE:zone30" should not be the right tag to put instead of source:maxspeed

Hi, actually you put maxspeed="source:maxspeed=DE:zone30" instead of source:maxspeed="DE:zone30". Can you please fix the issue?

Hi Artus92 and welcome to OSM!
It looks like you've created two empty areas (468728257 and 468728256). I assume this is an error. Can you please explain the purpose? I can delete them for you if you are not yet confident with the tools.

Hi SomeoneElse,
Yes I see your point and I've followed a little bit the comments about shop vs office for this kind of business. What do you propose? I'm afraid that I will not be able to make the difference between those two as I'm not from England and can't check by myself.

See also osm.wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23004_-_Typos

Thinking afterwards, this edit may have been too agressive... I hope it will not be perceived this way.

Hi, since only "candles" is documented on the wiki and was mostly used, I pick this one to consolidate the use of this type of shop. A bit of math: there was 37 shop=candle vs 102 shop=candles. Reguarding "Yankie" I decided to focus this type of mass edit to the bare minimum, i.e. not fixing other tags than the one I'm working on. Otherwise I would likely introduce errors. Consequently I will not check this tag and let it to someone else who will work at a local scale.

Hi @Claumires, is it normal that this changeset has deleted lot of ways and buildings I've drawn in this area ? I don't see any interest to remove them.

Hi,

Most (if not all) of those gas stations have opening_hours=Sa-Su 24/7 which means that:
1. the gas stations is opened only on Saturday and Sunday (which looks strange nowadays)
2. There is a conflict because "24/7" means that it is open 24 hours a day 7 days a week (and not only on Saturday and Sunday).

I think you wanted to say "opening_hours=24/7"
Am I wrong? Can you please fix those opening hours? If you want I can make the change for you.

Thank you in advance.

Bonjour,

Concernant les lampadaires, il y a deux soucis :
1. Mauvais formatage des horaires, il faut mettre 18:00-05:30 pour que tous les outils puissent reconnaitre cette valeur
2. Mauvais tag, il faut utiliser lit au lieu de opening_hours

Ce qui donne donc lit=18:00-05:30.

Pouvez-vous svp corriger ?

Bonjour,

Concernant les lampadaires, il y a deux soucis :
1. Mauvais formatage des horaires, il faut mettre 18:00-05:30 pour que tous les outils puissent reconnaitre cette valeur
2. Mauvais tag, il faut utiliser lit au lieu de opening_hours

Ce qui donne donc lit=18:00-05:30.

Pouvez-vous svp corriger ?

@SomeoneElse: Thank you!

Hi, this changeset was made a long time ago and I thought it has been reverted (with some others of the same type and of the same period). I'm going to ask for a revert by mail if it is still feasible.

Hi, Thank you for the revert SomeoneElse. No excuse for my defense, I have bitten off more than I can chew whithout understanding that by fixing tags I was introducing errors in some of them.
Reguarding the node Trigpoint pointed out, after an OSM/Bing/Google Maps survey it appears that this node is outdated: the maxspeed is 50mph and there is a node with the speed camera next to it. So this "80mph Truvelo" should be deleted I guess.

Don't know, This changeset is only about replacing deprecated properties. This relation already existed before. You should ask directly in the page of this way/relation.

Ok, thank you for the fix

I don't understand what didier2020 expects from me and where I have introduced any error. I only understand that I should have commented better m'y changeset.

Thanks for your care aseerel4c26. Because the type=broad_leaved has been declared as deprecated on the Wiki, on TagInfo, and in JOSM (where I've had more than once warnings on this fact), I did not feel the need to open any discussion with the community neither to create any page to document a fact already approved somewhere else. Sorry if I thought wrong. If the DWG thinks that it is vandalism and/or if this property is not deprecated then I don't mind about reversing it and let other guys fixing it at their own pace.