Land-o Calrissian's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 68727992 | over 2 years ago | Hi znood, Thanks for your reply. I regret my reply being so slow. My current contract ends tomorrow and I'm too pressed for time to address this at this point. If you or someone else could, I'd appreciate it :). |
| 68727992 | over 2 years ago | Hi znood, There is a track located close to the snowmobile path you added about 4 years ago near coordinates 64.921, 27.435. This track was added by a different user working on a project I was working on. I then edited this track as part of the same project. It seems that this track the other user added is actually a duplicate of your path. With your permission, I could delete the path and add your snowmobile=permissive and toll=snowmobile tags to the corresponding part of the track, effectively merging the two. Is this okay? |
| 21041291 | almost 3 years ago | Hi JyriK, I deleted your tracks with IDs 248426088 and 248426141 because they were both duplicates of the original track with ID 100054379. From what I can see, aerial imagery shows a single road corresponding to this track. Also, the original track predates them by almost 3 years and has a more extensive edit history (I noticed that you edited the original on the same date that you added these other tracks). Having said all of this, I also realize that I should have consulted you before deleting the tracks that you added. Is it alright that I deleted these? |
| 130134228 | almost 3 years ago | I see now. Thank you for clarifying the situation. I've removed the erroneous turn restriction. |
| 130470915 | almost 3 years ago | Hi Niels Elgaard Larsen, I replaced both of the original u-turn restrictions with a single only straight on restriction. |
| 130134228 | almost 3 years ago | Hi Niels Elgaard Larsen, the placement of the turn restriction sign here is a little ambiguous; in street level imagery the sign looked like it could apply to the intersection with Jens Juels Vej. However, I can see how it could apply to the northwest branch of Christine Løvmands Vej ahead. Are you saying that the northwest branch of Christine Løvmands Vej (aka the next intersection) should be the "to"? |
| 131172916 | almost 3 years ago | Hi Niels Elgaard Larsen, Thank you for your comment. I was using Mapillary street level imagery from May 2020 (the most recent I could find) which shows an unconditional left turn restriction; however, that imagery is apparently out-of-date. Thank you for your correction. |
| 129076987 | almost 3 years ago | Hi Niels Elgaard Larsen, Thank you for your feedback. I've corrected both destination sign relations I had added to this stretch of Østbirkvej. |
| 131075270 | almost 3 years ago | Hi houtari, Thanks for catching my mistake; I deleted the erroneous turn restriction. I somehow missed that that particular turn restriction no longer exists. I normally use the most recent imagery to make my edits. I'll try to be more observant in the future. |
| 130196503 | almost 3 years ago | Hi Niels Elgaard Larsen, thank you for your feedback. I'm actually not sure why I added that particular turn restriction. I examined all of the surrounding street level imagery and didn't find a turn restriction sign.
|
| 130093769 | about 3 years ago | The most recent street level imagery I could find for this area is from November 19, 2021. It's true that this area was under construction at that time and so it makes sense that the turn restrictions would change. Thank you for removing the relation. |
| 125417464 | over 3 years ago | Hi yasslay, thank you for your feedback. Are you saying that the no left turn sign just east of the intersection between East Street and Church Road is actually for Orchard Place? |
| 85684553 | almost 4 years ago | Correction: "...is superimposed *on* tertiary road Calle La Colonia". |
| 85684553 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Ernesto, I noticed that way/807791300 (with tag route=autobus) is superimposed tertiary road Calle La Colonia. Can you resolve this, please? |
| 117454519 | almost 4 years ago | Hi InsertUser, thanks for your feedback. Both Mapbox Satellite and Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta do in fact show what looks like water between 2 docks at this location. However, Bing aerial imagery and Maxar Premium Imagery (Maxar of which tends to be the most recent) show development where it looks like the 2 docks have been fused into a single, larger dock. This development appears to include a building. I'm admittedly a bit uncertain about whether it's a building; it could be a collection of cargo containers. I added the feature based on Maxar Premium Imagery. If you or someone with local knowledge has more complete/accurate data for this location/feature, I welcome any corrections.
|
| 107116919 | about 4 years ago | Hi diegoberesp, This changeset has a large number of overlapping buildings. Could you please correct this? Thank you. |
| 101141435 | over 4 years ago | Hi Guido, sorry for my slow reply. It seems that we have accidently added a few additional road segments on top of the existing roads when attempting to add turn restrictions. I am not sure exactly how this might have happened, but I have gone ahead and removed the duplicate highway segments in the changeset found here: changeset/101748095 . Hopefully, this resolves the issues on the map that you have mentioned. If there is anything else that you may need, or if there was something that I may have missed, please feel free to reach out again. Thanks, Land-o Calrissian |