1. Why is it not good? If the foliage does extend over the road, drawing across
2. Common misunderstanding there. `natural=wood` does not mean it is "natural" in origin. It means the trees part of nature, like `natural=water`. I have already added `managed=yes`, and `moved=yes` or `anthropogenic=yes` are possible theoretically, but not unless you know the actual history of these trees. If they are trees, they are woodland.

`=tree_row` is not a replacement for `=wood` areas. (rather it is widely considered the latter is preferred, which I don't take a position here)
You haven't replicated trees in the park, and foilage inside Tsing Yi Estate.

What do you mean by "not presented correctly"? Fix their shape. You deleting them straight out is very "rude" to other's effort as well.

This is not about `=shrubbery`, You are removing the `=wood` that actually exists there. `=hedge` and `=tree_row` are not relevant to this.

Not sure if a `place=farm` should get `tourism=zoo` simply because it raises animals.

Frontage road should not be `=service` simply because they are called "service roads".

Please don't delete tree areas.

No brackets as descriptor labels please. OSM is not a printed map. `name=` is for proper names only.

Please don't change `area:highway=footway` to `highway=pedestrian` + `area=yes` for the sake of making it displayed. They have different meaning. Tagging For Renderer is a bad practice.

No, this is not redundant. `leisure=garden` shows the area is a garden. It doesn't say when green coverage exists there. `natural=` adds the exact shape of the specific landscaping.

Please don't attach areas to roads.

Thx, but it's better to keep both together.

Please don't blindly upgrade tags. There were some nonsense case before eg `network:en=Hong Kong Metro` a clear mistake.

Can you please stop changing HK Tramway Ltd to RATP?

Please be careful not to change the entire building.

What is this trying to do?

Please split the tree area, not deleting the whole thing.

There is already a `motor_vehicle=permit` here though?

This is `route=railway`, not `route=tracks`. I meant MOL is included the ERL system alongside EAL. Though not sure how things are organized now. Conceptually the TML service can still be seen to run through West Rail and Ma On Shan Rail.

Some turn restriction you added duplicates existing ones.