Please don't remove `area:highway=traffic_island` . That's more accurate and precise.

2. As mentioned before, please only edit names, not delete the features

Please don't attach unrelated features to `highway=` roads. This doesn;t reflect reality, and make editing more difficult.

1. As mentioned before, please only edit names. Not delete directly.
2. `highway=` and `natural=` or `waterway=` are separate features

Please only edit the names, Don't directly the feature, as it is still a `=peak`

Please don't directly copy other maps, or base your decision on them, That risks copyright infringement.

As mentioned before, please don;t delete things you don't understand. These are `building:part=` with `building:levels=`

It's more accurate to not use `office=` on a government offices. That should be used for the departments inside. Eg the library is not a government office. The government offices complex is covered by `building=office` , and `landuse=institutional` (my preference) https://web.archive.org/web/20240522090540/https://www.tracestrack.com/information/

This is already has `building=museum` . It's the problem of whatever you are looking at. You are duplicating the `=museum` with the perimeter. way/99148524

(public or private housing designs)

Furthermore, many are constructed to public housing design, then given to disciplined services. So at least they should be `building=apartment` + `building:use=`

`=dormitory` has the problem of being unclear. Especially for universities, they have different apartment designs from disciplined services quarters. `=apartments` should be kept for these as they are no different from other buildings. `building=` is more structural than functional.

1. Specifically the tower `building:part=` will need to have `building:min_level=` added together

changeset/158806501

1. Hi, please don't simply change `building=` to `building:part=` even if this is justified. The entire `building=` (`outline`) needs to be checked and retagged, and the bottom parts changed as well.
2. Podium architecture is standard in HK. When there are multiple towers on a podium, they can be considered different `building=` cartographically. `building:part=` is likely not intended for this situation. When each tower has `building:part=` variation above, the `name=` will fail to be uniquely identifying.

1. Hi, please don't simply change `building=` to `building:part=` even if this is justified. The entire `building=` (`outline`) needs to be checked and retagged, and the bottom parts changed as well.
2. Podium architecture is standard in HK. When there are multiple towers on a podium, they can be considered different `building=` cartographically. `building:part=` is likely not intended for this situation. When each tower has `building:part=` variation above, the `name=` will fail to be uniquely identifying.

Please don't upload tests to a live public database. This is vandalism. Even if you reverted it yourself afterwards, it is still wrong.
osm.wiki/Dev_Server_Account

Please don't Lie To Renderer. There's no "military" here. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
This was voted boundary=border_zone

https://issuu.com/brandon.caraccioli/docs/portfolio2023

It has `=cycleway` , so I don't find "Footbridge" the best. Both are used.
https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202302/15/P2023021500292.htm
https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2023/english/counmtg/agenda/cm20230215.htm
https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2023/english/counmtg/hansard/cm20230215-translate-e.pdf
https://transitjam.substack.com/p/octopus-bridge-demolition-highlights
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLPU_KKAldQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIy80nhnM-o