Please don't add `=traffic_signals` to the point of intersection when it is already added to the stopping line. This is duplicated.

Please don't remove other valid names. Move them to `*_name=` as seen here.

How did you tell whether some of them are single? Regardless of that, and whether it is is preferred, you didn't replace them with `natural=tree` , and is thus removing data.
You broke a large `=multipolygon` here, and also deleted a `=bare_rock` later .

Please stop changing `=uncontrolled` to `=unmarked` when there is already `crossing:markings=no`

This is not what `company=` is used have. It duplicates info with the `=substation` .

Surely everyone refers to them as "Star Ferry" .

And you are notorious for accusing others without responding to them.

osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Hi, please read osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property and osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail? for issues. This is not preferred. The exact conditions should be recorded, not deleting because you want to do something based on good intentions.

You also removed other attributes.

Tags on a `=construction` or `proposed:highway=` reflects what it will be. Not what it is now.

You broke several tree areas here. Please don't touch them if you are not interested in editing them.

Please don't follow others blindly. This is the unpaid area only. The station box with the tracks and platforms are under Man Cheung St. Separate area should be created to distinguish them.

Please don't add estates and developments as `place=` . This causes inconsistency in both `landuse=` and `place=` .

Please don't move features wildly. Both are `=peak` on their own. When renaming, change the names only.

Please don't delete shops as they represent a shop space. This preserves the position, and avoids deleting any addresses accidentally. Remove the tags, change it to a plain "Point", or change to `was:*=` .

1. Please don't use `=permit` for "Except with permit" in HK. It means at most `=private` almost every time.
2. Please don't change `vehicle=` to `access=` . This means pedestrians are affected as well, without overriding.

Please don't change `=uncontrolled` to `=unmarked` . `crossing:markings=no` has already been used.

1. There is much consensus in Discourse. Plus applications eg Nominatm calling for this.
2. What does that mean? Lines are the equivalent for `route=ferry`
3. Why should the government be followed? They still don't resemble a name, more of a label that shouldn't be used. There are alternatives discussed. osm.wiki/User:Nadjita/Routes#New_tag_label=*
4. This is arbitrary. The naming on `=bus` doesn't follow Schedule of Routes exactly either for "Urban Route" etc. Preventing change doesn't hold, as further renaming is avoided for eg North Point via Kai Tak or Kwun Tong first. Both rerouting and change of management doesn't happen frequently anyway. This argument is not used on bus and trains either.
Coral Sea Ferry is the common name here. It shouldn't be obstructed by redundant info in `from=` and `to=` .

Please read osm.wiki/Proposal:Use_description_instead_of_name_for_route_relations and osm.wiki/Talk:Buses#Bus_Route_Naming . This should not be done.
Elsewhere eg London's River, they may even be unnamed. Staten Island Ferry doesn't need to say `=Whitehall - St George` either.