#RelationsWithNoType — review relations with no type tag
Posted by Kamil Kalata on 6 February 2025 in English.Hello!
I’ve just found out that ~2k out of ~13M relations have no type tag, ~220 of which have the type tag with lifecycle prefix or date namespace suffix, so I’ve decided to review them manually, with the ones with no tags containing the word “type” being the first, correct some mistakes (e.g. missing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:type=multipolygon) and delete the unnecessary relations (e.g. with duplicate tags). In case I make a mistake, please point it out on OSM Community topic or comment my changesets.
Regards
Kamil Kalata
Discussion