Have you found the right tag for "Corona-Schnelltest" yet? I don't think it should be "gnis:feature_id" since that's only for features cataloged by USGS.

Thanks! I'll look it up!

Which book was that?

Hi! I think the word "Mine" at this location on the USGS Topo map was a descriptive reference to the historical workings to the south and not the name of the peak. If the peak had an official name, it would be registered in GNIS but there's nothing there for this peak. Mind if I drop the name?

After digging a little more, it seems that the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve is elsewhere (https://fsp.sdsu.edu/about-us/). There is a Sky Oaks Field Station which is mapped nearby, but I haven't seen any evidence of a "Sky Oaks Ecological Reserve." Unless there is some documentation to support this or signage on the ground, I suggest we remove this node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131403484

Both the prior URL and the new URL refer to this location as the "Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve." Unless there's a more definitive source for the alternate name, I think we should revert this changeset.

Hi! I noticed you made some changes to the road through Davies Valley in the Jacumba Wilderness Area. I didn't understand some of the changes, but the situation out there is very unusual (in real life, regardless of what's on the map) so I wanted to check in with you to make sure we're on the same page.

I saw that you put in some turn restrictions. What prompted you to add those?

Google Maps is not a definitive source and not something we can use as a reference for mapping in OSM. The two definitive sources for this area are USFS, which manages the land that this section of road is on, and SanGIS, which records the names of all the roads in San Diego County. Neither of those sources suggest that there was a "Thunder Valley Road" here. USFS owns this land, and they've named this section of road "Thing Valley Road." See https://www.fs.usda.gov/ivm/index.html?minx=-12961613&miny=3873995&maxx=-12956721&maxy=3876484&exploremenu=no

I've looked at the street level imagery and there's no "Winery Lane" sign there. Even if there was, it would have to be official signage to apply the name to this road. An unofficial sign would be used for a loc_name tag at best. We'd expect the official signage to match the SanGIS record for this road, but SanGIS has this as an unnamed private road.

That may be so, but the street signs say "Hoberg Road," the SanGIS record says "Hoberg Road" and the address data for the parcels along this road are for "Hoberg Road." So, this is "Hoberg Road." You can't just arbitrarily give a road a new name.

Sometimes old data was imported into OSM with names that aren't correct. This looks like one of those cases. Removing "El Monte Road" from this track was correct. Adding a new name that is not signed on the ground and is not in official records is not correct. Unless there's an actual sign out there, this road should remain unnamed.

There is no signage on the ground to support this name change nor is the name recorded in SanGIS. I have restored the previous name.

I have reverted these improper name changes.

This road name is not present on signage and is not recorded in SanGIS. I have removed it.

No problem! I was just wondering if there might have been some signage to indicate the name change before I-5.

The original address data from SanGIS was correct. I have reverted the address information.

This is a private road with no signage and no name recorded in SanGIS. I have removed this name.

The original information placing these addresses on Highway 79 was correct. I have reverted this changeset.

The original information placing this address on Highway 79 was correct. I have reverted this changeset.

I know it was a long time ago, but when you added the "Kumeyaay Highway" name to sections of I 8 in Imperial County, what did you base that on? I see that the official name designation only covers San Diego County (https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-system-information/documents/place-names/web-2020-named-freeways-final-a11y.pdf) but was there additional signage for the name in Imperial County?