Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. It is helpful if you can include a detailed changeset comment that describes the changes that were made. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Il est utile d'inclure un commentaire détaillé sur l'ensemble de modifications décrivant les modifications apportées.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140918095

Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. It is helpful if you can include a detailed changeset comment that describes the changes that were made. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Il est utile d'inclure un commentaire détaillé sur l'ensemble de modifications décrivant les modifications apportées.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140917970

Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. I thought you should know that the elevation tag should only be a numeric value in meters. The unit "m" for meters should be omitted. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Je pensais que vous devriez savoir que l'étiquette d'élévation ne doit être qu'une valeur numérique en mètres. L'unité « m » pour les mètres doit être omise.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140917855

Hi! Is there a verifiable source that confirms that this island is not named Tavae and that it has no other name?

Hi! We lost the place=islet tag in this changeset. Based on the remaining features, this should still be an island or islet. Would you restore the tag?

Hi! This changeset deleted some relevant tags from relation/6082213. Could I ask you to restore that information?

Hi again! Looks like we lost Faaite Atoll in this changeset when the tags were deleted from way/138480699. We should figure out how to restore that.

Hi! What happened to Nihiru Atoll? The tags were removed from way/138152975. Did these tags get moved somewhere else or did we lose this information?

Hi! What happened to Tahanea Atoll which was previously tagged on this way? Did the information in the tags on this way get moved somewhere else or did we lose this information?

Hi! It looks like a while ago you made several changesets that have islands with natural=coastline;bare_rock. The islands in these changesets (e.g., way/38596843) aren't rendering right now because they have semicolons in the natural=* value along with "coastline". The natural=coastline tag is special and can't have semicolons in it. You might make a separate congruent way with natural=bare_rock to get everything to render.

Hi! Several of the islands in this changeset (e.g., way/207949048) aren't rendering right now because they have semicolons in the natural=* value along with "coastline". The natural=coastline tag is special and can't have semicolons in it. You might make a separate congruent way with natural=bare_rock to get everything to render.

Hi! The island in this changeset isn't rendering right now because it has a semicolon in the natural=* value along with "coastline". The natural=coastline tag is special and can't have semicolons in it. You might make a separate congruent way with natural=bare_rock to get everything to render.

Hi! Several of the islands in this changeset (e.g., way/184478366) aren't rendering right now because they have semicolons in the natural=* value along with "coastline". The natural=coastline tag is special and can't have semicolons in it. You might make a separate congruent way with natural=bare_rock to get everything to render.

Hi! A couple of the islands in this changeset (ways 1202803575 and 1202803576) aren't rendering right now because they have semicolons in the natural=* value along with "coastline". The natural=coastline tag is special and can't have semicolons in it. You might make a separate congruent way with natural=bare_rock to get everything to render.

Also, it looks like this node is missing a primary tag. The address, description, and name aren't enough to map something on OSM. You also need to have a tag identifying the type of business.

Hi! Thanks for contributing information about your business to OSM. It looks like you got the node in the wrong place. It should probably be a few blocks north. Also, you might use the rest of the addr: schema to correctly tag the address. But, more importantly, the description value is not verifiable and looks like spam. If that can't be fixed, it should be removed. Let me know if you're able to correct it or if you need help!

Both USFS GIS data and the USFS Visitor Map show the continuation of FS 54 through this property as being publicly accessible. Were you able to verify from information on the ground that the gate is locked or signed to restrict public access?

Hi! I just cleaned up some of the alignment along Kelso Cima Road and replaced the line that you had redrawn. That was a while ago. I wondered if you figured out how to move existing highways or if that's something you wanted help with.

Ah. I'm sorry to hear that happened. Thanks for correcting the tag. Let's hope that the pub is now friendlier to everyone, especially since it seems to have a good selection of ales! Cheers!

Some time back in changeset/102871214, you added an lgbt_friendly=no tag to this pub, now changed to lgbtq=no. The guidance on the Wiki (lgbtq=*) suggests not to use tags of this type. Was there a verifiable source you used to determine that this tag was appropriate?