You should keep the edits you make in geographically small areas when possible. This one goes from a small village in Africa to a cornfield in the middle of North America.

You added your name on a node in that Nebraskan cornfield and added a pedestrian crossing where I can't see any with the imagery you apparently used. You also removed the highway tag from the road outside the village in east Africa. Why?

Your previous edits also seem to be similarly poor quality and should be fixed.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175778876

Black Bayou would probably be classified as a waterway=river for most of the length you mapped. Additionally, you can also add the USGS GNIS ID from the domestic name search, perhaps to a waterway relation.

It looks like you may've applied English Bayou to one or two segments it probably shouldn't go on. I would consult the USGS GNIS domestic name search map for river names. When you pin a stream from the search results it will show the mouth and the source on the map, and you can usually figure out the rest in-between.

Additionally, you can remove all the junk NHD import tags. There are a few that can be helpful when manually reviewing old imports, but here they don't do anything.

Yeah that'll definitely be the end state, though keeping it separate with landuse=construction may be appropriate for the time being.

Are these signed locally with their phase numbers? Ideally the main name tag should be what's observable on the ground, and other possibly relevant names should go in one of the other name tags.

Just so you know, you seem to have accidentally marked the river channel as a storage tank. I have fixed it, but do be careful with your edits.

One extra thing is that road crossings should be split from the neighboring sidewalks and tagged as footway=crossing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174631749

I wouldn't apply the extra "name=*" tag to the yard unless it's officially named as such. I would also consider expanding the "landuse=commercial" to the entire lot since it looks like they're storing other cars and trailers outside the yard.

Additionally, rather than "office=towing" I would probably use "service:vehicle:towing=yes" with "shop=car_repair".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174627260

Hi Sawyer, it looks like you accidentally included a road from Sulphur, LA in this changeset. You should try to keep changesets geographically compact when possible to make them easy to monitor. Additionally, the road is best described as residential, so I have changed it back.

Ok I see now. Sorry about that!

Looks more like it goes through the gate on the west side of that building rather than under it
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171787307

Hi, you made edits across a pretty big geographic area. It's best to keep them local so that they're easier to review and don't alert people across the country :)

Hi, try to keep your edits geographically compact if possible. It makes it easier to review. :)

Also, it looks like you added several tiger tags to some of the ways you were working on, but the tiger tags are all from an old series of imports and shouldn't be used.

Looks fine. Are these edits from the Report a Camera form at plateprivacy.com? You might consider mentioning that in your user bio or the changeset's source field.