Perfect. I'd recommend including it in the changeset descriptions or possibly in a source tag.

It seems a lot of the buildings are missing the actual building tag, is that by design?

Hi Kyaw,

Lots of great buildings, but what is the source?

Hi Coolsun,

I'm pretty sure leisure=nature_reserve are independent from natural=wood.

natural=wood describes the actual land cover and leisure=nature_reserve describes a protected boundary that may or may not follow the land cover.

What is your source for this nature reserve?

I am going to change this back to natural=wood, and then you are welcome to draw your nature_reserve boundary based on your source.

Here is an example of how it is done with a national park:
relation/5964085

If I am mistaken, then please correct me. The last thing I want is an edit war.

It should be fixed now.

Looking at it a bit more, I can tell it should have been "lanes=2".

That is a mistake and can be removed.

Hi Mateusz,

I also did not know what amenity=water meant. I have tagged man_made=water_tower, amenity=drinking_water, emergency=fire_hydrants, and natural=water in the past.

So I went back to check what was there, and it is indeed amenity=drinking_water. I have updated the tag now.

Thank you for reporting this.

The primary name is generally in the local language or languages.

How do the locals write the name of this place?

Meung' Ka or 勐嘎? I assume the latter is the case, but please correct me if I am wrong.

I have already update the name, but I'll be happy to put it back if I learn that the locals really write it as Meung' Ka.

No problem, mistakes happen.

I have re-added the address, did you remove any other addresses?

Hi,

A quick explanation. I'm adding house numbers to OSM every day for about an hour or two. Recently I was told I have 10 days to move out from my current rental place and find a new place.

While I am adding house numbers, it was easy for me to quickly call the numbers and find the prices in the area. I know this data doesn't belong in OSM but switching between apps to register the house number and then somewhere to try and register the rental price was tedious.

So I decided to go the easy route and add what I learned to OSM, and in a few days when I have found a place remove it all again. It'll probably be less than 30 places in total.

So, that is my poor excuse for adding rental notes to houses.

What is your excuse for removing the house number that I've collected? I can understand remove the contact and note. But the house number is now gone forever as well.

I was just looking at this changeset again and I can see a lot of valuable information were removed by it.

Before:
addr:continent Asia
addr:country TH
addr:district เมืองอุดรธานี
addr:district:en Mueang Udon Thani
addr:hamlet หมู่ที่ 3
addr:province อุดรธานี
addr:province:en Udon Thani
addr:subdistrict บ้านจั่น
addr:subdistrict:en Ban Chan
name บ้านคำกลิ้ง
name:en Ban Kham Kling
place village
source Bing; sign

After:

is_in:continent Asia
is_in:country Thailand
is_in:country_code TH
is_in:iso_3166_2 TH-41
is_in:state Udon Thani
is_in:state_code 41
name บ้านคำกลิ้ง
name:en Ban Kham Kling
place village
source Bing; sign

Why remove this much data? Even if mistagged, that was still really useful information.

Amazing work on buildings and house numbers!

You are putting in a lot of effort into adding details from outdated imagery. I urge you to please switch to ESRI imagery for this region whenever it is available, it is newer and makes it easier for the two of us to work together. I hate removing work that you just added because it is already outdated and doesn't match the latest imagery available.

Hi Ye Min Myat Oo,

I see we are active in the same area and we sometimes have a few conflicting edits.

It looks to me like you are using the old Bing imagery rather than the newer ESRI imagery.

If your editor allows you access to the ESRI imagery, could you please consider using that instead?

Thank,
Johnny

Teach me!

I loaded OSMI but didn't get anything at all.

Amyway, the relation have been broken down to smaller parts, which should make it easier to work with.

I think you broke the wood relation.

This changeset have left a huge amount of empty nodes. My guess is a failed upload where the "building=yes" ways got lost.

If you don't have an easy way to fix this, I'd recommend we just remove all the nodes and start over.

This is the 2nd Fah Mai Handloom POI placed in the wrong spot. I'll clean it up.

Hi Stacey, are you sure about this location?, I was in the area earlier today and all I saw in that direction was rice fields.