John Stanworth's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 131962719 | almost 3 years ago | Thanks for that Jan. Good to hear from you. That little stub was the start of a potential path which is quite clear on the Strava cycle heat map but when I went to walk it there wasn’t enough on the ground to justify mapping - maybe there will be by next year. I forgot to delete it.
|
| 88526649 | about 3 years ago | Good to hear from you Mateusz. Thanks for pointing this out. I see what I (and others) have been doing. When a mapped stile has been changed to a gate by the local authority I have changed the ‘barrier’ tag but not deleted the old ancillary stile tags. I’ll use your overpass turbo search to make a start on putting them right in my area. If you come across any that I miss in the future don’t hesitate to delete the nonsense tags. Thanks again. John |
| 60512989 | about 3 years ago | Thanks Andy. Yes - maybe a cut and paste error. I’ve been watching the debate about those errors. Well done for the way you handled that.
|
| 125817813 | over 3 years ago | My preferred app ‘Footpath’ also routes down that path. I didn’t think it would! |
| 125817813 | over 3 years ago | As an experienced walker and mapper of footpaths I would like to make a utilitarian point. In my area and perhaps all over the country access=private/no/unknown tags on public footpaths are not uncommon and cause problems for all the different routing apps used by walkers and runners - they won’t route down these paths. Decisions about mass edits must be made by people who understand the philosophy of OSM better than me but this edit would probably correct thousands of errors for every unwanted error it created. And the millions of Strava/Komoot etc etc users in the U.K. would notice the difference. |
| 124988080 | over 3 years ago | Lifecycle prefix on the turbary roads etc instead of deleting is a great idea! And yes my changeset comments tend to be very inadequate :( My only excuse is that I do all my mapping on my phone and often as I’m walking so lengthy typing is difficult. But again you are right - if I’m deleting paths it is bound to cause alarm so I need to give some explanation.
|
| 124988080 | over 3 years ago | Hi Gurglypipe. Good to hear from you. I’ve had two big walks out of Coniston this week and I’m hoping to have a couple more. My creating, moving and deleting paths was based on them. As you may know there are many paths on the map that don’t exist on the ground, particularly in the Lake District and North Wales, making OSM and therefore Strava etc an unreliable resource in these areas. There are two main causes : some were paths and were correctly mapped but are no longer used and have ‘healed over’, others are marks from old structures like turbary roads which don’t exist any more but are drawn in as paths by armchair mappers. The ones near Lingstone Beck come into this second category. Deleting these paths is perhaps more important than drawing in missing paths but I would suggest that you only delete paths if there is no path visible on the ground AND no trace on the Strava heatmap. Cheers. John |
| 122521310 | over 3 years ago | That’s great Andy. Glad you noticed. I cycled the White Peak Loop with friends last week and later noticed odd things with the mapped paths around the canal bridge at the end of the High Peak Trail. Sorry I didn’t follow through with my changes to the relation there - I got involved with editing the rest of our cycle route.
|
| 116544635 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Paul,
|
| 114574618 | about 4 years ago | :) Well spotted Andy. Thanks. I’ll put it in now. Need to go and have a walk around the bit where it goes round Meadowhall before I can finish off the last corner. Thanks again. J |
| 113814340 | about 4 years ago | Thanks Tom. I’m afraid it was only a walk through with friends - not a proper survey - so I only improved a few paths. To be honest you keep the footpaths in your area well mapped. I wish it was as good up here around Sheffield. :) |
| 103409090 | about 4 years ago | Hi mrpacmanmap. Thanks for updating the Kelham Island boundary. I guess it follows the historic course of the mill race. The mill race now runs due east from the opening on Millsands to join the Don there. Would it be possible to detach the watercourse from the relation and put its current course on the map. Cheers. John Stanworth. |
| 105861641 | over 4 years ago | Thanks. :)
|
| 105861641 | over 4 years ago | Yes. We haven’t really got a proper story from Katy have we. When I come across blocked public footpaths here in Sheffield I show the path as far as it goes and put a No Exit tag on the node on the end where it is blocked. I then send a photo and info to the Ramblers.
|
| 105861641 | over 4 years ago | Hi gurglypipe. Good to hear from you. Sorry about my very vague changeset comments. My daughter who is a keen OSM user is just back from a running/cycling trip to the Hutton Roof area. She was dismayed by the number of mapped paths that didn’t exist on the ground. She is normally very reliable so I have made a few map edits based on her survey/runs.
|
| 103732635 | over 4 years ago | Hi arte2002
|
| 89039221 | over 5 years ago | Hi Tom. Nice to hear from you. It was good to meet at the mappers pub meet - it was in Derby I think. I am missing those meets. Hope all is well with you in Wirksworth.
|
| 85690417 | over 5 years ago | PS Don’t hesitate to change any of my mapping that you think is wrong. I don’t mind at all. You don’t need to let me know. :)
|
| 85690417 | over 5 years ago | Yes. I’ve removed it. Thanks both.
|
| 71667445 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for that Dave. I must have just seen the start of that conversation about platforms being footways but missed the final conclusion. :) |