JhowieNitnek's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 104342718 | over 3 years ago | Nee nu iet meer is vrij recent gesloten |
| 123584348 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I was not confused about the smaller base on UrbIS, the reason In made it bigger is because the building is bigger with pillars and stuff. Could you please revert this change? |
| 116516724 | over 3 years ago | I don't think Dubbelganger is the name. The article probably just translated it for clarification of the name so I don't think name:fr=Double name:nl=Dubbelganger and name=Double - Dubbelganger is necessary here as it only has one name |
| 116516724 | over 3 years ago | I found it https://www.bruzz.be/culture/news/uitbreiding-lesbrigittines-voedt-relatie-met-buurt-2007-08-14 |
| 116516724 | over 3 years ago | The name is Double it wasn't a mistake I did it in purpose. I can't find the source of it anymore as it has been a long time but the name is Double. |
| 117944088 | over 3 years ago | There is a climbing structure in the walls here |
| 116516724 | over 3 years ago | Hey Glenn, if you match geomatries try not to remove buildings with names that still exist. You accidentally removed way/1078059124 and merged it with way/260917265 even though 260917265 is multiple buildings big and not one. |
| 122635454 | over 3 years ago | Hey Joost zou dit nieuw stuk fietspad niet in de F20 relatie gezet moeten worden? |
| 121542624 | over 3 years ago | Oh my bad I read the question wrong |
| 121542624 | over 3 years ago | Indeed frituur needs to be friture cuisine=friture |
| 121542277 | over 3 years ago | shouldn't be part of this tunnel be tagged as under construction aka the part under the railway at the North Station |
| 121307235 | over 3 years ago | I think it does because it is a research institute but it is also a government office for public health |
| 121177338 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for notifying me about that. I removed it by accident I will add it back |
| 120810681 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 119637975 | over 3 years ago | Shouldn't it be expanded to Place Sainctelette?
|
| 120116095 | over 3 years ago | UrbIs has been updated so that it is now considered one building and not different ones |
| 119375987 | over 3 years ago | The base of the building is much smaller then the actual building so I thing it's best you reverse your edit |
| 111111127 | over 3 years ago | Why did you made it a point and not the whole building? |
| 114380049 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Thierry1030 is snap niet zo goed wat je bedoelt? Alles is tog in orde? |
| 117975089 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Ik zie dat je allemaal gebouwen aan het hertekenen bet aan de hand van satalietbeelden maar die zijn niet accuraat genoeg, je moet meer op de RGB kaart letten. Dat is een officiele cadaster en gebouwenkaart van de vlaamse overheid |