old_name="BVGS Playing Fields" - really?! It should be obvious that this is not the main school site. Surely tagging should be on the school area, and not duplicated on the playing fields. Maybe a relation would be better for the two areas but duplicate tagging is unnecessary.

Was there any need to add "Margate" to the end of the name - it's obvious from the map it's in Margate, plus the school don't use that suffix anyway - they use "Kent"

This name change makes no sense at all - Peterborough may have merged with Stamford, but both colleges still use their individual names, not the group name.

Why have you changed the postcode on the Broomfield Hall site to the postcode of The Roundhouse site?
Also, are you planning on changing the names on all four campuses - if so, please use another tag to distinguish them. Personally I don't think it should have been changed because it removes information which has been established for years on OSM.

This school has two sites in a multipolygon relation on OSM and some tagging is already on the relation. The only thing valid on this way is the UPRN, so any additional tags should be transferred onto the relation.

This school no longer has a base here - you noticed that the main postcode didn't match and deleted it - but the school does still have five sites elsewhere around Yeovil.

According to its website, this school calls itself "Pioneer School", not "The Pioneer School" and I think the name on OSM should be the name on the school website

This school is called "Haberdashers' Knights Primary" not what you have changed it to. The data on MapRoulette is nearly a year old, but changes since then like this are available on the Get Information About Schools website - see https://get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/Establishments/Establishment/Details/147363

This school uses the name "Emmanuel Junior Academy" on its website, so I don't think it should have been changed, especially now the "official_name" tag duplicates the "name" tag

This school no longer uses the phrase "A Specialist Sports College" on its website, so I don't think the name should have been reverted to the old name as you have done here.

Hi Fradeve11, the website you've added is not valid - the correct website is on Get Information About Schools website, so the data you've used must be either incorrect or out-of-date.

Ah, I couldn't make out the gate - as long as that route is still walkable, that's fine.

How does this path cross the A19 - is there a tunnel? I can't see a gap in the fence on the south side or the central reservation by looking at aerial imagery or mapillary.
Ref image: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.516071111111&lng=-1.2819488888889&z=17&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=1139869233551614

Hi IBMapper, you've been great updating the map around Ingleby Barwick recently.
I have a couple of comments regarding adding buildings:
1) Where a building has corners with right-angles, you should use the "Squaring" tool (right-click, or keyboard shortcut Q)
2) For a building with an open courtyard in the middle like Whitehouse Farm, a relation is best - see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD

Happy mapping,
Jez

Is that definitely the name on the sign - "Cook's" - the website states "Cook"?

No response so I've fixed in changeset/131611016

Thanks for checking - I was confused by a quote from the metro mayor in a press article at the end of November '22 stating the station was closed but the train still stops there, which seemed to me contradictory!

... but services are still shown in the working timetable (though next scheduled is not until 19th February due to strike and five weekends of engineering works): https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:Y42858/2023-02-19/detailed

Hi amircah91,
The geometry of this area was mapped ok: it's wrong tagging - incorrectly changed by a previous editor - which flagged this up in your tool. I suggest this way is put back to how I originally mapped it in version 1. I've read that this is possible in JOSM, but I've never used JOSM.

Ooh, that's an interesting maproulette challenge. Yes, looking at satellite imagery it's five separate buildings, but as these were all imported from OS OpenMap Local there's A LOT of generalisation.
(On the one hand, it's nice to have buildings that are square and not hand-drawn badly - see Marske-by-the-Sea - but on the other hand it's an awful lot of work to split them all.)