Should I get rid of foot=yes on roads you shouldn't walk on?
Posted by JesseAKARaccoon on 30 October 2021 in English.In San Francisco, several roads are marked as having sidewalks, which is normal and good. But I notice some (like Van Ness Avenue here) are marked with foot=yes as well. Even though you clearly shouldn’t be walking around in the actual busy street.
This seems pretty wrong? Being marked as having a sidewalk should be enough for routers. As a bonus, the sidewalk is double-mapped, and Van Ness should be marked sidewalk=separate, I think.
I see a lot of this in SF, which is why I’ve been hesitant to fix it. But I can fix this, right?