Hello! It should ve 'ref:eid' (as I use elsewhere) and is ID of cultural heritage places of Slovenia government as indicated on https://geohub.gov.si/ghapp/giskd/.
Thank you for warning. I will fix that. Do you have better suggestion on tagging those IDs?

Pa tudi nekaj popravkov na HE Medvode in v bližini Mednega.

For site https://healthsites.io/.

Hi, thank you very much for correction. Luckily this is my first and only electric scooter rental point.
Changeset changeset/172962341 fixes it, I believe.

Ne bi vedel. Jaz ga nisem dodal, ampak le nekaj malega spremenil (predvidevam, da le položaj).

Hi!
Could you revise it already?
All I can say is that I can't find anything anywhere that would indicate that there is a guest house here.

Sorry for large changeset. Should have split it.

Pozdravljen!
Od kod imaš ta poimenovanja njiv s številkami oz. "niva"? Podobno pri "hosti". Kakor si napisal z malo začetnico, je dokaz, da ne gre za lastno ime njive/gozda, ampak za občno ime v narečju. Za to se uporabljajo oznake, kot so "landuse=farmland" za njivo in "landuse=forest", kar je že označeno.

Ime, označeno z "name=*" naj bi bilo uradno, oz. zelo splošno sprejeto. Glej več na name=*.

Tudi na https://geohub.gov.si/ghapp/giskd/ je kapela Marijina, kar je najbolj zanesljiv vir.

Pozdravljeni!
Ali morda še veste, kaj je bil vaš vir za imenovanje cerkvice/kapele "Sv. Filip in Jakob"?
Vaše poimenovanje sem našel na Najdi.si: https://zemljevid.najdi.si/poi/POI17376/sv-filip-in-jakob.
Na https://www.druzina.si/zupnija/zupnijska-cerkev-sv-marije-vnebovzete-apace je vpisana kapela sv. Marije Pomagaj v Žepovci (vendar natančnejši položaj ni določen), na Googlovih zemljevidih (https://maps.app.goo.gl/LNJCmmE1xaX11A5z5) pa je označeno, da je ta kapela sv. Marije Pomagaj na mestu, kjer imamo trenutno označeno cerkvico Sv. Filipa in Jakoba.
Vprašanje je, kako potrditi, katero ime je pravo.

Pozdravljeni!
Ali je smiselno označevati paketomat z mnogokotnikom? Kje ste uspeli dobiti tako natančne podatke o položaju/geometriji paketomata? Na satelitski sliki paketomat namreč ni viden.
Meni se ga zdi v tem primeru dosti primerneje označiti s točko.

I found out, I didn't cite the source: https://maps.flurnamen.at/; for all local names of forests, fields, meadows, wetlands...
Sorry.

I found out, I didn't cite the source: https://maps.flurnamen.at/; for all local names of forests, fields, meadows, wetlands...
Sorry.

I found out, I didn't cite the source: https://maps.flurnamen.at/; for all local names of forests, fields, meadows, wetlands...
Sorry.

I found out, I didn't cite the source: https://maps.flurnamen.at/; for all local names of forests, fields, meadows, wetlands...
Sorry.

I found out, I didn't cite the source: https://maps.flurnamen.at/; for all local names of forests, fields, meadows, wetlands...

Oh, yeah, sorry, I ve never been sure about these arrows. So they are always down, like for cliffs (I thought about it more like barrier against river).
Thanks. Errors fixed now.

Hi! Thank you for note.
I agree about weir.
Although not really understand, what you mean with the convention? Possibly my "man_made=embankment" in near, on the river? For that, I found out it really should be inversed.

Have you possibly walk over there? Because I have worked only with web resources.

Yes, thank you. I have now corrected the errors, the path is connected.