Added airstrip descriptive to existing runway - thanks to Tom from lentopaikat.fi !

Again removed "aeroway=runway". There already is a "disused:aeroway" tag and that is the more appropriate, as confirmed by the X markings seen on the runway surface.

Unsure about that ICAO code, can someone either confirm it, or remove?

consolidated data then removed existing "node" entry - please avoid entering double information

no visible remains of aerodrome

tagging of "extra" runways: no names please, cfr wiki

tagging of "extra" runways: no names please, cfr wiki

iata code no longer assigned

removed node already emptied for lack of added value

Aerodrome already well described, please avoid double information.

not an aerodrome as such

Doppelinfo entfernt; ebenso ueberflussige tags

not an icao code

Aerodrome is reported "disused"

Double track between L50 and Schaarbeek was renamed to L28 after renovation works (2021?)

reverted to original state, correcting myself

Mais si, l'aerodrome est tres bien taggue, cfr WAY 42019232

"ref" normally used for 08/26 or similar

added airstrip descriptive to existing runway - remember a runway cannot be a destination in a flight planner, but an airstrip can

T-33 detailed & relocated