1. disused as an aerodrome

    Closed
    #131042913 0 1 0 0

  2. tentatively added 15/33 ref - correction welcome!

    Closed
    #131012603 0 1 0 0

  3. Apparently, this aerodrome took over the icao code of Krusevac - entirely dug up? - and probable some of its functionality as well.

    Closed
    #131012206 0 1 0 0

  4. slightly re-tagged

    Closed
    #131007700 0 1 0 0

  5. aerodrome already very neatly given in node 254474131 - please avoid adding double information

    Closed
    #130981096 0 1 0 0

  6. reverted - neither iata-code nor iaco-code are valid.

    Closed
    #130980107 0 1 0 0

  7. This is not an aerodrome by itself, and should not be tagged as such. The existing situation was quite okay, no need for further tweaking.

    Closed
    #130976823 0 1 0 0

  8. Not a valid icao code! But yes, I know, some (not very clever) websites present it as such.

    Closed
    #130976624 0 1 0 0

  9. added website

    Closed
    #130681720 0 1 0 0

  10. standard tagging for model_aerodrome

    Closed
    #130680433 0 1 0 0

  11. aerodrome & runway disused as per basulm.fr

    Closed
    #130667996 0 1 0 0

  12. basulm: "Base ULM fermée temporairement"

    Closed
    #130667948 0 1 0 0

  13. FR:piste => EN:runway , pas si dur que cela :) ?

    Closed
    #130637470 0 1 0 0

  14. aerodrome & runway disused as per basulm.fr

    Closed
    #130637065 0 2 0 0

  15. aerodrome & runways disused as per basulm.fr

    Closed
    #130636980 0 2 0 0

  16. updated runway from www.dl.cz

    Closed
    #130600340 0 1 0 0

  17. icao as per es:wikipedia

    Closed
    #130589962 0 1 0 0

  18. "abandoned" is too gentle, here :)

    Closed
    #130548496 0 1 0 0

  19. More standard tagging for old railway. In fact, it is said to have been already dug up.

    Closed
    #130505374 0 3 0 0

  20. removed "aeroway=airstrip" since this might lead people to actually land there even without an emergency

    Closed
    #130481113 0 1 0 0