From the mapbox imagery, half of the buildings in this block look like yard, greenery or very just very odd.

Is it common to have a building of 10 feet/3m width around there? Is it still a building?

Do you have some local knowledge that can support your mapping or you use purely satellite imagery?

Zmena rika ze tam je nejaka nova rampa, ale zmena pouze maze parkoviste a kresli nejake dve podivne brany. Zdroj je OpenStreetMap, coz nedava smysl.

Muzete prosim vysvetlit co je toto za zmenu, jaky jste pouzili zdroj a proc popis zmeny neodpovida zmene na mape?

Tyto tri stanice jsou na stejnem miste. Predpokladam, ze jde o tu stejnou stanici. Prosim o kontrolu skriptu, at nam to nepribyva donekonecna, popripade, jestli jeste nekde vznikly takoveto duplikaty.
node/11601972782
node/12126173689
node/12124631377

Crossing residential area and buildings. The validator in JOSM should report warning. Please do not ignore the warnings!

Next time, please take care not to break map with your changes. This changeset misplaced two address points in Pasohlavky to completely wrong locations. Fixed now, but it was like this for last 6 years!

please, provide meaningful comments to the changeset. #mapping really does not say anything to the future readers about what you did, why and anything. Please, see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

The building distribution as you mapped is not clearly visible from the Mapbox Satellite imagery (at least the one in the iD editor). Did you really use this imagery? If not, please make sure you put the right one in the metadata.

To by bylo lepsi cele revertnout. Ten 164380721 nedela nic uzitecneho. A snazit se to opravit tak nejak zhruba jako se podarilo zde komplikuje reverty.
V changeset/164427092 jsem opravil do puvodniho stavu.

Touto zmenou bylo rozbito nekolik veci kolem technologickeho parku a pridany nejake zbytecne body. Zmena neobsahuje ani popis proc byly zmeny udelany. Prosim, davejte si pozor co delate.

A urcite je tam brod na hrazi rybnika?

Diky za odpoved. Tak to prosim dej do poradku. Je dobre psat zdroj minimalne do komentare k sade zmen a taky je vetsinou lepsi pouzit stavajici geometrie nez vytvaret nove a stare mazat

Ahoj, proc jsi v tomto changesetu vytvoril duplicitni potok Baštice? A jaky zdroj jsi pouzil? Vetsina cesty je pod stromy, takze na satelitnich snimcich neni videt.

This changeset is removing the tags tower:construction and height from the three towers. Is it intentional? I see the values were added originally by you 10 months ago, but they are hardly verifiable from the bing imagery.

Please, provide sources for your changes. This way, it looks like an import or some AI mapping.

Dobry den, status poznate podle otrofoto map? Nebo z ceho jste vychazel, ze se jedna o silnici treti tridy?

Ano, tunel je pod estakadou, ale neni s ni spojeny. Tim, ze jste v teto zmene spojil spolecnym bodem
node/9335193200
tak jsem posledni mesice premyslel, proc me ta navigace vede tak divne. Ted by melo byt opraveno.

Thanks for the prompt reply and fix!

Hi, why did you remove the access=private tag from the private roads around Grand Canyon West viewpoint? Did you visit recently? I was there last month and the roads are indeed private and not accessible for general traffic, which ends on the huge parking lots near the tourist center.
It was correctly tagged since the beginning in 2012, until this changeset changed it to public access.

Prosim, zavirej po sobe poznamky, ktere vyplnis jako ananym a pak je dalsi den zaneses do mapy, jako napriklad 4278692.

When you convert parking lots from points to areas, please remove the points, otherwise you duplicate the features, which will just cause more issues to fix.