Jack the Ripper's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 84542087 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Ian. Did you have a question about this changeset? |
| 84542087 | almost 5 years ago | WHAT??? Who are you calling moron, imbecile????? |
| 84542087 | almost 5 years ago | Oh yeah? Who are you calling idiot, moron? |
| 84542087 | almost 5 years ago | Who are you calling dum, idiot? |
| 84542087 | almost 5 years ago | Dude, you're dum. D-U-M dum. You left off the speed limit units! |
| 81517663 | about 5 years ago | Hi Anastasia. You are correct--these are open again now. I had planned to go back through them all in early March and "reopen" them on OSM, but other events led me to forget. I'll try to remove that access=no tag on them this weekend, but if you find any I miss, don't hesitate to fix my error. Regards,
|
| 83788058 | over 5 years ago | Good catch, Trent. Thank you. |
| 84789330 | over 5 years ago | Hi mueschel, Yes, I'm aware of those. The problem (which this particular change isn't a good example of) is that there are different weight limits depending on axle configuration, not just "hgv:trailer". As an example, here's a weight limit sign with 2 different restrictions for a 3-axle truck, depending on the weight distributions of the axles: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/sNPIyJlEMpgJ-jrmSktPeA And I've come across quite a few more with 3 or 4 different weight limits for 5-axle trucks, all of which are large tractor-trailer setups. In other words, the current maxweight tagging scheme is insufficient to handle the actual truck configurations that drive on the roads. This came up in the osmus Slack channel a while back, with a long-time editor mentioning that he was going to update the wiki with a basic maxweight scheme for axles, until I showed him some of the signs that are posted. |
| 80400965 | almost 6 years ago | Doodlebugz is a little more varied than just "interior decoration." That said, I guess it's as good of a tag as any other. Interior decoration, gift shop...several tags could apply to it. It's almost a boutique, really. |
| 57644912 | almost 6 years ago | Hi Linley. It wouldn't surprise me at all that the roads were renamed. But, if you want, I can try to go through the area in a couple of weekends and verify the road names. |
| 67168311 | almost 7 years ago | Hi pattamaa. Thanks for the response. Editing OSM is very much a learning process, one that I'm reminded of every time I find an early edit of mine that was clearly in error. Even now years later, I seem to make odd mistakes that I can't explain. |
| 67104723 | almost 7 years ago | Hi Claudius! Just a note to say thanks for fixing a goof of mine. No idea how I ended up putting the name in the religion field.... |
| 67168311 | almost 7 years ago | Hi debott! That residential road that you changed to driveway...looks like it should be a residential road. There appear to be houses along it. |
| 63802897 | about 7 years ago | Hi Jackson, This temporary lane is not outdated. It is still very much in use, and will be for the foreseeable future. I'm going to revert this changeset in order to restore the lane. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. --jack |