Hidoo00's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 135313819 | over 2 years ago | Hi,
|
| 121943344 | over 2 years ago | Hi,
|
| 130386715 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 130336442 | about 3 years ago | Ja, är inte helt säker på hur man bäst ritar det … Det står att building-outlinen ska innefatta hela byggnaden, men i de fall där entrétaket bara är typ en glasskiva så känns det konstigt, så då ritade jag taket som egen byggnadskropp. Men jag är inte konsekvent 🤷 |
| 127611560 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 124566301 | over 3 years ago | Oh absolutely. Didn't find a tag so I went with ATYL, but solar:tracking is obviously superior, then. Feel free to fix them, or I will do it in a few days! |
| 66744801 | almost 4 years ago | Fick du något svar från kommunen? |
| 118244821 | almost 4 years ago | Thank you for finding it! Fixed the typo. |
| 103294595 | almost 4 years ago | Looked into it, and no, couldn't find any information regarding copyright. Should I remove the features not visible from aerial/streetlevel imagery? |
| 113771097 | about 4 years ago | Hi! Thanks for the tip! I found a few other buildings as well with redundant nodes. Will keep that in mind in the furture! |
| 106372690 | over 4 years ago | Oh, of course. I'm thinking backwards. |
| 106372690 | over 4 years ago | Will that impact routing engines though? Because I'd imagine it's more important not to route buses or lorries there, than erroneoysly excluding tractors. |
| 106372690 | over 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 105107883 | over 4 years ago | Got it! I assumed all "upgrades" that the iD editor suggests were implemented to make it easy to manually check that all objects are tagged according to the latest standard. |