Hello BradBretelle,
Can you comment on why Zoeterwoude West is moved to the middle of a meadow?
I will revert the change.

Ik had spoor 20 van Dordrecht over het hoofd gezien. Bedankt voor het checken. Aangepast met changeset/174177739.

Bedankt voor het bericht. Ik zal een kijkje nemen. Als dat is aangepast was het een onbedoelde wijziging.

Hi, can you comment on railway=milestone or https://github.com/hiddewie/OpenRailwayMap-vector/issues/392 how to interpret the railway milestones prefixed by `pkm:`? I would like to display these correctly on the OpenRailwayMap. Thank you!

Thanks for the response. I was mostly interested in the reasoning behind the change, to improve the rendering of such stations.

Hi, this changeset was discussed in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-s-bahn-stations-with-light-rail-yes-and-train-yes/131423.

Can you provide a perspective on why the S-Bahn stations are annotated with `train=yes`?

Thanks!

Also, way/498682328 "Razdjelna brana" remains a waterway=dam because this structure is actually built across the stream/lake instead of around it.

Hi Janjko, thanks for the comment. I think waterway=dam is not correct, because for this lake, the dam is not built *across* the water, but rather around it. From waterway=dam: "A barrier built across a river or stream to impound the water". So this is why I tagged this as man_made=embankment, because there is also a road on the embankment in some places. Another option would be man_made=dyke or embankment=dyke.

Thanks!

You can view the map at https://openrailwaymap.fly.dev/#view=17.21/51.204525/3.447955&style=signals. The current scope is Europe. I have taken some of your tagging and symbols into account.

Specifically the signals currently tagged as `BE-SME:small_signal_triangle` might be better tagged as `railway:signal:minor=BE:PSA` as documented on the wiki as "petit signal d'arrêt". They seem to be the same thing.

Also, for the light signals, the `railway:signal:*:form=light` tag seems to be missing.

There is still a lot of work for Belgium, currently only speed signals (https://openrailwaymap.fly.dev/#view=17.86/50.442371/3.818843&style=speed) and main signals (https://openrailwaymap.fly.dev/#view=17.1/50.82409/3.263459&style=signals) are rendered.

Hello, are these signals the signals as documented on the wiki (osm.wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Belgium), or different signals specifically for Stoomtrein Maldegem-Eeklo? I am working on visualizing Belgian railway signals, and would like to handle these properly as well. Thanks.

Thanks, I didnt notice the duplicate key. I reverted my changeset.

description should be A124

Thanks for the comment. I fixed the tags in changeset/120008769

Revert changeset changeset/112327606

Beste jonrellim,

Excuses, ik zal de adres nodes weer terugzetten. Ik heb niet goed gekeken of er meer informatie aanwezig was dan alleen de winkels. Op de meeste plekken zijn de adres nodes gescheiden van de 'functionele' nodes zoals winkels (osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element). Er zijn namelijk winkels met meer dan 1 adres, of adressen met meerdere winkels erin.

> Ook is het handig voor iedereen als er bij de changeset een beschrijving wordt gegeven die aangeeft wat er veranderd is.

Ja, dat zag ik ook net. Vespucci toonde geen scherm om een commentaar te uploaden. Dat is misschien een bug. Normaal doet hij dat wel.

Groeten

@Vartek

> Generally, whats the idea of adding pure commercial initiatives, as eurovelo, into visible layers of social communities effort created maps?

The general idea is that many parts of the EuroVelo routes are signed and visible. Not all routes are fully completed and signed (such as this one which should be corrected). Compare it to public transport routes which also follow a non-verifiable route, but are present in OpenStreetMap.

The goal of cycling routes, which I wish to promote, is that they are 'usable' by cyclists. Routes are not usable if they are incorrect or have many missing pieces, or the ordering is incorrect.

I will also contact the person responsible for the EV2 route in Poland to ask about this part on the east of Warsaw, and why the route goes through the dangerous swamp.

I try my best to improve the data quality and make it usable. Mistakes slip in, and I thank you for correcting me.

Hello conradoos,

Thank you for the comment. I agree that having a route with sections that lead into a swamp is not OK and should be removed. I will revert my change in the coming days and mark the section of EV2 in Poland as proposed.

Thank you for your comment with further elaboration.

I made the route into a route:proposed tag, like your suggestion.

I hope that in the future the routes will be marked on the ground, and we can fully render it :)

I also do not like to be called names in your changeset comment "исправления за новичками и не только", changeset/102953659.

Yes I agree, the route is in a proposed state. But then use the state=proposed tag like is documented in the wiki, see osm.wiki/Cycle_routes#Relations (proposet state).

This will allow renderers to recognize the relation as a route and render it as appropriately (dashed line for example).

The key proposed:route is not accepted as far as I can find, proposed:route=*.