OpenStreetMap
HiddeWie's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 102948989 | over 4 years ago | Yes I agree, the route is in a proposed state. But then use the state=proposed tag like is documented in the wiki, see osm.wiki/Cycle_routes#Relations (proposet state). This will allow renderers to recognize the relation as a route and render it as appropriately (dashed line for example). The key proposed:route is not accepted as far as I can find, proposed:route=*. |
| 97680075 | over 4 years ago | This changeset has partially been reverted in changeset/101595033 because there has been no reaction on the comment above, and there has been no replacement superroute EuroVelo 11 relation uploaded to replace the deleted one. |
| 101444019 | almost 5 years ago | Should of course be Lithuania. |
| 101441868 | almost 5 years ago | Should of course be Lithuania. |
| 101434454 | almost 5 years ago | Thank you for noticing me. I checked multiple imagery sources, but it seems they are all outdated. Sorry for missing this. I will revert these 2 changesets. I finally found https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.8782998&lng=24.2165685&z=17&pKey=yGOkloFhbHZwpfwa78pugm&focus=photo which is the newest street imagery (Sept 2020). I should of course have checked Mapillary before trusting the areal imagery before changing the data. |
| 97680075 | almost 5 years ago | Hello Frankas, Why was the global EuroVelo 11 relation relation/2766981 deleted? I propose to revert this changeset and restore the EuroVelo relation. |
| 94951498 | about 5 years ago | Hello blackboxlogic,
|
| 89374924 | about 5 years ago | See comment on the diary entry for full permission of the ECF to use the GPS tracks in OpenStreetMap: @Robhubi/diary/394685#comment48607 |
| 89374924 | about 5 years ago | I will ask EuroVelo for permission to use the track in OSM. |
| 89374924 | about 5 years ago | Hallo Robert, Danke für Ihr Nachricht. Mein Deutsch is nicht sehr gut also ich antworte auf Englisch. The GPX of the EuroVelo routes can be downloaded publicly from the EuroVelo website (https://www.eurovelo.at/en). For the usage of "proposed": feel free to add the tag to the route section. I compare the mapping of a bicycle route to the mapping of public transport (bus/train routes). They are (sometimes) not visible in the world, but should still be mapped in OpenStreetmap for completeness and advanced routing features. I have no 'ground' knowledge of the EV14. My only goal is to have the route mapped completely such that cyclists from all over the world can enjoy it, which is the goal of the European Cyclists’ Federation. Feel free to tag the route with additional tags that tell how the route is marked in the world. Freundliche Grüße,
|
| 92276197 | about 5 years ago | Beste Leo, Dank voor de reactie. Strak gezien is de moped/motorcycle/mofa toewijzing niet nodig. Maar er staat in de binnenstad expliciet aangegeven dat brommers/motoren niet zijn toegestaan, onafhankelijk van bezorgtijden. Zie bijvoorbeeld de volgende foto https://images2.persgroep.net/rcs/aBKFUazZfv_1vQP9h36q_W4k4R0/diocontent/175562431/_fitwidth/694/?appId=21791a8992982cd8da851550a453bd7f&quality=0.8&desiredformat=webp. Het leek me een goed idee om dat expliciet op alle highways aan te geven. In het bijzonder omdat veel voetgangersgebieden in de meeste steden in Nederland wel degelijk toegankelijk zijn voor motoren/brommers (mits langzaam wordt gereden). |
| 53258902 | about 5 years ago | Hello.
|
| 57796834 | about 5 years ago | This import introduces many values of description=null. This tag can be removed if there is no value. Thanks in advance. |
| 59144217 | about 5 years ago | This import contains many wall=null tags. These are invalid and can be removed.
|
| 55634500 | about 5 years ago | This import contains many wall=null tags. These are invalid and can be removed.
|
| 55533771 | about 5 years ago | This import contains many wall=null tags. These are invalid and can be removed.
|
| 55506129 | about 5 years ago | This import contains many wall=null tags. These are invalid and can be removed.
|
| 55909979 | about 5 years ago | I noticed that many buildings contain wall=null. This tag does not make sense and should be removed.
|
| 87050325 | over 5 years ago | Beste jonrellim, Bedankt voor het herstellen van de ongewenste wijziging unclassified -> service. Het was aardig geweest om een commentaar op mijn changeset te doen met een reactie van de reden. Vriendelijke groet,
|
| 80421201 | almost 6 years ago | Hello Denis,
Kind regards,
|