OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
52046837 over 8 years ago

Hallo _torsten_. In relation/7575255 sollte es bestimmt ein `mtb:scale` anstelle von `mtb.scale` werden, oder? ;-) #newkey #typo

52035244 over 8 years ago

Hello cybeer77. At way/524638354 you have tagged `manmade` instead of `man_made`, right? ;-) #newkey #typo

52031606 over 8 years ago

Hello Alan Bragg. Also this changeset looks like an import. And at way/29776747 you haved tagged `lleisure=..`, i think there's a `l` too much ;-)

52028313 over 8 years ago

Hello Tarimo Julius. At way/524572839 and way/524572838 you have tagged highway twice (one is misspelled), and please decide it's residential or unclassified ;-) #newkey #typo

52042391 over 8 years ago

Hello cafecho. At way/524633845 there's `heigh` instead of `height`, right? ;-)

52044620 over 8 years ago

Hello cafecho. Is way/63689208 really a building or a building:part. There you tagged `heig` instead of `height`, right? #newkey #typo

52025336 over 8 years ago

Sorry, i was too fast: not `level..` instead but the mentioned "Simple indoor tagging" in the linked wikipage.

52025336 over 8 years ago

Hello samuelrussel. At way/335687879 you have tagged `floor...`. I think it should be `level...`, right? Have a look at level=* ;-) #newkey

52045012 over 8 years ago

Hello Supaplex. At node/4524319690 you have tagged `diused:amenity`. I think you have turn around the u and s ;-) #newkey #typo

52048770 over 8 years ago

http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm

52038818 over 8 years ago

Hello cricket81. I think the first version of way/524662517 was better. Now it really doesn't make sense: building:level without building but surface?! And all the descriptions have a smell of (unwanted) SEO. #newkey

52050676 over 8 years ago

Hello pigsonthewing. At node/5106084752 you have tagged `cypher=VR`, which is unkown. Did you mean something of royal_cypher? Please have a look at amenity=post_box#Extended_Usage
#newkey

52028123 over 8 years ago

Hello andy mackey. At way/524570536 you have tagged `customers allowed=yes`, which is unkown. Do you mean perhaps of `access=customers`? Please have a look at access=*#Access_tag_values
#newkey

52051304 over 8 years ago

Hallo geow. Bei way/147021954 ist bei `covererd=yes` wohl ein `r` zuviel ;-) #newkey #typo

52035783 over 8 years ago

Hello minseo. At way/524642781 you have tagged `constrcution=..`. I think it should be `construction`, right? #newkey #typo

52047349 over 8 years ago

Hello jnsp. At way/524729801 you have tagged `bulding:part=...`. I think you missed an `i`, right? And is `area=yes` necessary? #newkey #typo

52047291 over 8 years ago

Hello StenSoft. At way/25535780 you tagged `brdge:ref=...`. I think you missed an `i`, right? #newkey #typo

52052569 over 8 years ago

Hello Alan Bragg. Is this an import? Is there any discussion about your edit?
Why i'm asking: in this changeset you have introduced a lot (nearly 20) of new, unkown, undocumented and uppercase keys! I don't think, that this should be in the osm database.

52023526 over 8 years ago

And have a look at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/theatre%3Atype#values, there you can see it is commonly in use ;-)

52041524 over 8 years ago

See discussion for amphi at changeset/52023526