Hello, if you're using more specific tags than building=yes then please clearly state the source of that information. It is at times possible to spot e.g. some religious buildings from aerial imagery becasue they are visually distinct, but how do you know that a certain building was built as a house?

Hello, It was unnecessary to map the building as a multipolygon, the outer footprint would have sufficed. I think the dark spot in the middle is caused by a feature on the roof casting a shadow. In some places you mapped solar panels as buildings. Move footpritns to the base of buildings; in this case you shortened a valid highway, becasue you ran out of room to fit all the features which exist at the ground level. Hope this helps. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171524878

Beware that roofs may have items in them which may trick you into thinking there are multiple buildings where there is perhaps only one.

Hello, The living street here is more or less straight and you'll only have enough room to fit everything if you move the building footprints to the base of buildings.

Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use. If there's some reason why you think this is a valid use of the tag please let me know.

Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use. If there's some reason why you think this is a valid use of the tag please let me know.

Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use. If there's some reason why you think this is a valid use of the tag please let me know.

When mapping building footprints consider that you are looking at the roofs which may have stains making it appear as thogh their shape is different.

Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read layer=* to better understand its use.

Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read layer=* to better understand its use.

Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read layer=* to better understand its use.

Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

Hi, I appreciate you improving the geometry of a few of the buildings here, but the middle footprint appears to envelope multiple buildings, the rightmost feature looks to be a field, the layer tag was not removed from the smallest building, and the NW footprint includes part of the building to the north and it has not been positioned at the base of the building (which is easier to spot when cross referencing another source like Bing). The layer tags aren't immediately obvious, perhaps you use it already, but the layer chacker paint style helps with spotting them. Hope this helps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173585383

Hi, thanks for moving the footprint you added to try and place it at the base of the building though it should have been moved slightly further north and east to achieve this. You correctly recognised and deleted roof furniture, but the building footprint you added is too small; it should extend further south. This is clearer when cross refernecing another source such as Bing. Hope this helps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173704166

Hi, thanks for moving the footprint you added to try and place it at the base of the building though it should have been moved slightly further north and east to achieve this. You correctly recognised and deleted roof furniture, but the building footprint you added is too small; it should extend further south. This is clearer when cross refernecing another source such as Bing. Hope this helps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173704166

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.