The footprints you mapped likely represent temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. Footprints should represent buildings and not barriers like hedges. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403682

The footprints you mapped likely represent temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. Footprints should represent buildings and not barriers like hedges. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403682

the footprins you added here are likely temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. You corectly modified the residential area to avoid overlap with the footprints you added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403175

Hi Charlotte, the footprint you added my represent a temporal yurt and perhaps should not have been added. It has been rounded correctly but is oversized. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403507

Hi, Marie. The footprints you mapped here are valid and appropriately squared. The western one is inaccurate the Easterone is almost accurate but is slightly too long see how I mapped them in Changeset: 168925772. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403145

Hi Pole Pole, There are a few things that I see could be done better in this changeset. It was a good idea to copy and paste footprints; this could have been applied to the inner and outer ways of the multipolygons too. Read this diary @Koreller/diary/404988 ---The residential tags should have been preserved. The inner and outer ways should not have building tags: see how they render on the OSM carto layer and check the multipolygon wiki page. You identified buildings under construction, but did not use the construction tag correctly Reference: construction=* ---It appears to me that you did not properly account for off-nadir when positioning the footprints and on at least one occasion you mapped a footprint which overlapped an exieting one: replacing its geometry (ctrl.+shift+g) would have been the best approach. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166752306

Take care to ensure that your highways follow the centre of the road visible in imagery, especially in dense populated areas becasue they could overlap other features which have not been mapped yet. I haven't check thouroughly but your tagging of highways appears reasonable. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822780

Highways and landuse areas should not share nodes: hold alt while mapping to prevent this. The highways I flagged overlap but do not share a common node: the junction is invalid and routing software will not recognise it as such. Take care that you connect highways to one another at junctions. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822850

Invalid building tagging; I addressed it. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822626

See my resolution in Changeset: 168891669. Accuracy is important when mapping; quality is much more desirable than quantity. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. You can see how I mapped these footprints in the affore mentioned changeset. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822091

The building footprints you added were incorrectly tagged with the value river: I resolved the invalid tagging error. The footprints you mapped were inaccurate. The project you're working on requests the mapping of highways and waterways; please only modify other features if they are causing problems with mapping the requested features. You're likely restricted in the tagging available in ID so that you stick to the project scope. See Changeset: 168891442 for my resolution of the tagging. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822395

You correctly identified buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are inaccurate (oversized). You reduced the accuracy of some existing footprints. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403237

footpritns of individual buildings should be tagged with building=* and so likely beyond the scope of the project you were working on. Try to see if a simple shape will suffice when mapping buildings before more unique options. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159237547

The footprint I flagged envelopes two buildings. It's easier to see this in bing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859991

You are identifying buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are generally oversized. Take care to not include the shadow in the footprint. I think this oversizing contributed to the mapping of shared nodes and overlapping between footprints. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859199

Generally the buildings you mapped are valid and appropriately squared, but oversized. Take care to not include the shadow in the footprint and keep in mind that roofs tend to overhang building walls.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178107

Overall a good contribution. The footpritns are generally valid and accurate. The highways and residential areas have been modified to avoid data overlap issues.--- Highways should follow the centre of the road in the imagery. The round footprint you mapped should be square because it has a blue roof its shape can be better seen in Bing --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483751

There is a building here but the footprint you mapped is several times the size of the building. Accuracy of mapping matters. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159717588

Don't worry about having deleted those footprints; I restored them.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404130

The footprints you're adding are valid, appropriately squared, and fairly accurate, though sometimes slightly oversized. You mapped with bing imagery which is older at time of mapping and so the footprints do not align with ESRI. I recomment offsetting imagery before mapping. You can read about how to do this in my project comments.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857442