Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175535091 | 10 days ago | Hi, you deleted a no longer existing building which is good, but you did not reuse the existing building data correctly, because the footpritns now represent different ones than they did before. Look for a pattern, could a significant portion of existing data all be moved in the same direction to align it? To see what I mean, have a look at https://osmcha.org/changesets/176202824 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/ |
| 175847430 | 10 days ago | Hi, you merged a POI representing a settlement to a building footprint. These features are not directly physically linked e.g. if this building were to no longer exist or if it moved that doesn't mean the settlement would too. I undid this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
| 175538178 | 10 days ago | Hi, I think you added some non-buildings here. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
| 175848948 | 10 days ago | A task boundary is just a conceptual boundary; if a feature like one of the buildings you mapped here crosses it just map the entire building. If it's a larger feature like a landuse are or highway map just beyond the task boundary so that others can continue mapping them. |
| 175848809 | 10 days ago | A task boundary is just a conceptual boundary; if a feature like one of the buildings you mapped here crosses it just map the entire building. If it's a larger feature like a landuse are or highway map just beyond the task boundary so that others can continue mapping them. |
| 176009572 | 10 days ago | Valid deletion, all footpritns added represent buildings, if you could map the slightly smaller going forward that'd be great. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
| 176009393 | 10 days ago | Your deletion of the round footprint on the left was valid, becasue it represented vegetation.
|
| 175817684 | 10 days ago | This footprint likely repersents a building, but it's oversized.
|
| 175817320 | 10 days ago | Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch. You duplicated exisitng building footprints. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|