Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172223866 | 3 months ago | It looks like you applied the incorrect tags to this area. I tagged it with only landuse=residential. Did you intend to map in Tanzania? |
| 172223950 | 3 months ago | How did you end up mapping in Myanmar? Did you intend to? It looks like there were duplicate footprints here. You need to offset the imagery when the data has a consistent missalignment with it. I deleted this footprint in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172234747 preserving the older footprint.
|
| 172223755 | 3 months ago | Hello, you mapped a building as though it were a residential area. See my resolution in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172233800 |
| 172232202 | 3 months ago | Hi Tebby, This footprint you added includes its southern shadow. Please exclude shadows when tracing footprints. This becomes especially improtant when mapping in dense areas and space is limited. Thank you for your contribution. see how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172233071
|
| 172232026 | 3 months ago | The acuracy of footprints you mapped here is very good. I think the SE footprint represents a rock beside a waterway and that one of the other footprints represents vegetation becasue of its colour. Thank you for your contribution.
|
| 172229006 | 3 months ago | When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](roof:shape=*#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. See how I mapped these footprints in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172229127
|
| 172228812 | 3 months ago | Hello, the footprints here represent buildings but are generally larger than in imagery. I think you'll be able to see how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172228835Thank you for your contribution.
|
| 172228483 | 3 months ago | Well done I dentifying this building. It looks like you used ESRI for support which is a good idea. In this area I used mapbox which shows a clear view of this building. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172228515 --- Thank you for your contribution.
|
| 172228046 | 3 months ago | This is the correct link to my changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/172228201 |
| 172228046 | 3 months ago | Hello, the footpritns you mapped here all represent buildings. They could better reflect the imagery. Often they were larger than they appeared in the imagery. See how I mapped them in https://osmcha.org/changesets/ The following is a general comment about mapping building footprints; When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](roof:shape=*#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/ |
| 172223120 | 3 months ago | I also wanted to sat that you identified a building in the imagery and updated the residential area by increasing its accuracy.
|
| 172225076 | 3 months ago | Hello, the footpritns you mapped here represent buildings, and have been appropriately tagged and squared, but are larger than the imagery shows them to be. See how I mapped them in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172227835 When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](roof:shape=*#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. |
| 172225571 | 3 months ago | Hello, overall you mapped these footprints well, just take care to not include the shadow cast by buildings in their footprints. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
| 172223120 | 3 months ago | Hi, welcome to OSM! The name key is used for the names of features; not your name. The contributions you make are tracked via changesets like the one I'm commenting on here. osm.wiki/Names I resolved these errors in; https://osmcha.org/changesets/172223399
Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/ |
| 172223384 | 3 months ago | I made a minor modifiecation to this footprint in https://osmcha.org/changesets/ 172223434 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
| 172221293 | 3 months ago | Hello, The source [survey](source=*#Specific_values) indicates that you have personally seen these buildings at their location. Do not apply it for remote mapping activities like this, unless you have actually been to the place being mapped. See how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172221732 A general comment about mapping buildings; When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](roof:shape=*#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag, press F1 on the select working mode icon to see the various editing shortcuts. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. Thank you for your contributions. |
| 172199064 | 3 months ago | Resolved by https://osmcha.org/changesets/172203097
|
| 172199064 | 3 months ago | Hello, it looks like you forgot to square a couple of buildings here. If you press `i` and change the unsquare building parameter to 15 degrees ID will do a better job of showing warnings about unsquare building footprints. --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
| 172196114 | 3 months ago | The footprints you mapped here are quite accurate they just need a little adjustment to make them as accurate as the imagery allows. See how I mapped these footpritns in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172197252 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
| 172195928 | 3 months ago | Overall the footpritns you mapped here are very good. The Western footprint includes the shadow cast by the building; take care to exclude these from footprints. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|