It's a while since you mapped this, but the buildings you mapped and tagged as huts generally have either circular or square footprints. Search for images of "Tukul hut" to see how these buildings loook at ground level. Almost all of the footprints you added represented buildings in the imagery you used for mapping, but it looks like you copy and pasted the footpritns which led to many of them being inaccurate, some would have been better represented by square footprints. Copy and pasting can be effective when used appropriately e.g. when the architect did too. It can save time to copy and paste round footprints becasue they have no aspect ratio, but please move (m) and scale them [shift+(-/+)] to make them accurate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160634295

Hi welcome to OSM. Please include the yards and all appropriate buildings fully within the residential areas you map. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093021

Valid steeltment mapping but the residential area should be extended in some places. You should envelope all appropriate buildings and land within a residential area and not have it cutting across buildings in the imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092016

Land use areas and highways should not share common (grey) nodes. Hold alt when mapping in ID to prevent the creation of shared nodes. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092210

Overall a good contribution. The SE residential area could have been extended West and South. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092535

This residential area should have been extended south and the place node would then be tagged as a village. Resolution in Changeset: 169134539
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169091850

You addressed your previously incorrect tagging of this landuse area, well done. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093181

Resolved in Changeset: 169128435
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169091948

The place POI is accurately mapped and tagged. The residential area could be extended in places to include all likely residential land. You added unnecesary tags to the residetial area; landuse=residential is sufficient. Name is reserved for features that have names e.g. Eiffel Tower. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169091948

It's potentially okay to add this place node here, though it may not be necessary to map it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093513

Personally I do not think this residential area should have been mapped. I would have just mapped the obvious buildings in the North of what you mapped as a residential area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093483

You improved the geometry of a residential area to include more buildings in its North.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093540

Please draw your residential areas around the settlement and not just buildings e.g. the area encircled by hedges around the buildings is likely residential and should be included. Check Changeset: 169127638 to see how I mapped it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093660

Hi Vincent. The settlements you mapped here look okay... it's just that you mapped them in Nepal instead of Chad. When mapping using ID in a tasking manager you should see a pink area denoting the task boundary. If you do not see this then save your work if it's valid and reload your browser or the task. Without a defined boundary you may map endlessly adding each feature that comes into view. Watch this to see what I mean https://youtu.be/XMtpZf9RoMc?feature=shared&t=3146 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092483

Hi Vincent. The settlements you mapped here look okay... it's just that you mapped them in Nepal instead of Chad. When mapping using ID in a tasking manager you should see a pink area denoting the task boundary. If you do not see this then save your work if it's valid and reload your browser or the task. Without a defined boundary you may map endlessly adding each feature that comes into view. Watch this to see what I mean https://youtu.be/XMtpZf9RoMc?feature=shared&t=3146 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092483

Hi Tania, it looks like you identified and added some likely highways in the imagery, but tagged them incorrectly. Please reference osm.wiki/Map_features and highway tag aftrca for how to tag highways in this region.--- The project you locked a task in #17823 requests the mapping of buildings; not highways. Therefore you are not required to add any highways as part of it, perhaps you could modify them if they caused data quality issues with features requested for mapping. Watch this video to see how to find porjects based on your interests https://youtu.be/XMtpZf9RoMc?feature=shared&t=862 ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Preserve the project hashtags when contributing to projects. See my resolution in Changeset: 169113177 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169077423

Hi, it looks to me like you improved the accuracy of the residential area here. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169085259

Just out of curiosity, why did you tag this as a secondary highway? Check out this page osm.wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa before tagging more highways. Thanks for your contribution.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169065797

Hi, you certainly made an improvement to the map data here but didn't tag the highway correctly. You correctly deleted the secondary highway in the East here and recognised that the Western one should aslo not be tagged as such, but it is also not a path, because it is wide enough for a car to drive on as evidenced by the erroded tracks on the ground visible in the imagery and its width. I tagged it as unclassified instead. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169067336

The highway you added does not appear secondary to me: it would be more accurately tagged as unclassified. Secondary highways connect large towns to cities. This highway connects a hamlet to the highway network. Connected highways need to share common (grey) nodes in order to be considered connected and for routing to function properly. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169065700