Most of the footprints you added here are valid, accurate and appropriately squared. Some outline multiple buildings. Thanks for your contribution.

The buildings you added here are valid and appropriately shaped. Some are a little small because I'm assuming you wanted to avoid issues with highways: in this project it's okay to move highways out of the way when required. Thank you.

You created nodes shared by highways and buildings here: hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existng data. Move the data or offset the imagery so that features have enough room where necessary.

All footprints here are valid, but could be more accurate. Consider how data representing physical features interacts: You added a footprint which overlaps a highway here. ni this case the highway should have been moved to make space for the footprint.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177410

Although they could be more accurate and squared (q) it looks like you identified possible buldings under construction here.

All of these footprints are valid and appropriately shaped but generally could be a touch smaller (shift+-/+)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160953964

The highways you added here are tracks becasue their primary role is to provide access to agricultural areas. Unclassified haighways link settlements.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164691168

All the footprints you added here represent buildings but could be more accurate and should be squared (q). Thank you for your conribution; please keep mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092379

The footprints you added here likely represent yurts as shown in the project mapping guide and should not be mapped. I deleted these footprints.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092118

Hi, generally isolated dwellings will not have a sufficient number of buildings to warrant mapping a residential area around them, for example way/1371859099. To quote from the project instructions: A residential area is an area of land predominantly dedicated to housing. Draw a residential area around a cluster of five (5) buildings or more. You also moved a node of a building which shared a node with a residential area. You may want to consider drawing a new geometry using fast draw and using the replace geometry function for smaller residential areas; doing so will reduce the possibility of modifying features which share nodes. Thanks for your contributions; keep mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164131336

Overlap issues are usually caused by data geometry. Layer tags indicate that a feature is above or below another.

All footprints here are valid and most are accurate. Remember to use the q key to square footprints when appropriate and use the other editing shortcuts to make mapping accurately easier. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090471

All footprints you mapped here are valid, accurate and appropriately squared/circularised. Thank you for your contribution; please continue mapping. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163528981

The footprints you mapped here are generally valid and accurate but should be squared (q). Thank you for your attention to detail.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164089441

Only feature which have a name should have a name tag: add hashtags to your changesets to track your contributions instead. I removed the name tags from these buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159717484

This footprint is valid but inaccurate. Remember to square footprints when appropriate (q).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159716980

These footprints are invalid because they outline barriers: footprints should represent individual buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159716946

Adding a layer tag is not usually the appropriate way to resolve overlap issues. In this case the highway should have been moved out of the way of the buildings in the imagery. Reference the mapping guide of the project. Issues are just automated flags; decide the best course of action when you see them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164089689

Looks like you identified buildings in the imagery here but the footprints are not very accurate if you place too many nodes like with the building to the south you can delete them with delete or backspace, if you don't make enough you can add them by by dragging from between two other points.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177322

The footprints here are valid, accurate and appropriately squared. Please continue mapping. Thank you for your high quality contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161254211