Why did you delete the village node in this changeset? If you come accross nodes like this in the future, even if you cannot see a settlement in the most recent imagery or if they don't have a name, it's best to change the tag to place=locality instead of deleting them outright. This makes it easier to undo the change if needed, to preserve local place names, and to classify the highway network. Here the settlement is clearly visible so deleting it was incorrect regardless. See Changeset: 164356744 for my resolution --- The building footprints are all valid and fairly accurate: the main inaccuracy is their orientation use ctrl.+shift to rotate features and ctrl.+alt to scale them in JOSM. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328907

You caused the multipolygon error, becasue you created a duplicate of a relation which was already there. I deleted the new relation you added to rectify the error. ---The health centre footprint is also not as accurate as it could be I used the building tools plugin, draw nodes and extrude tools to improve it and accounted for off nadir imagery when placing it. --- You correctly resolved a highway/building overlap. Please see Changeset: 164356401 for my resolution.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328177

Thanks for squaring these footprints but when doing this be sure to check the accuracy and validity of footprints for example the Wester most one in this changeset is still significantly larger than it should be.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164325031

The some of the footprints you added here are too big in particular the two Eastern most ones. The building you modified is now less accurate I would say that the section you extended the footprint to should instead be mapped as a different footprint.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164180260

All footprints added here are valid. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179925

It looks like you improved the accuracy of residential areas in this changeset. I improved the accuracy of the middle one in Changeset: 164338399 so that you can see how I mapped it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328880

Again you correctly addressed highway buidling overlaps. It's likely that all the footprints here are valid; some could be a little more accurate though. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328168

You correctly addressed a highway building overlap. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164325356

All but one of these footprints are valid; the one I flagged represents a barrier. The footprints you added here should have been squared. Two share a node: hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to data. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179798

You added temporal yurts and footprints for buildings which are no longer visible in the more recent ESRI imagery. I encourage using multiple sources to aid your interpretation; just be sure to cross reference the most recent source to see if the features you're adding to the map are still there.

The building footprint should be round (press o after tagging). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482992

I see you tried to improve some of your contributions here, that's good but you deleted an accurate footprint you previously mapped. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483183

This footprint is valid, accurate, and has been appropriately squared. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482737

These footprints are inaccurate. Check if simpler geometries like quadrilaterals and circles represent a building well before trying alternative solutions. Mony of te footprints here outline barriers which may also cast shadows; map what you are certain is a building and use that data to inform your interpretation of imagery. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483730

All footprints are vaild and most are accurate. The residential area could have been a bit smaller, but you modified it appropriately so that it envelopes the buildings in the settlement and avoids overlapping with footprints. This is easy for me to take care of in JOSM. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175516

I don't know why I was under the impression that you were using JOSM. Those tools aren't available in ID. It's easier to work with existing data in JOSM. In ID editor getting familliar with the editing shortcuts can be useful as they contatin functions not referenced in the Help section. Open the shortcut panel by pressing the ? key.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164186113

It should take a simmilar ammount of time to; one is delete->redraw, the other is (move) redraw->replace. You'll need the utills plugin to do it. Conflation works very well when you need to replace geometry en masse, because you draw geometry on a new data layer meaning that you can temporarily hide the osm data layer allowing you to view the imagery directly. You'll need the conflation plugin to do this, I recommend reading its about pages linked to when installing the plugin and osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Conflation , then opening two new layers in JOSM so that you can freely experiment and play to learn how to use it without worry. It talks about using an external database/source; you'll essencially be creating that footprint database before conflating.

This is a decent changeset. All but two of the footprints you added here are valid and appropriately squared. Generally they could be be more accurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091441

The two large footprints to the north are not valid because the envelope multiple buildings: map one building per footprint.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093523

Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094184