This is a valid footprint that has been appropriately squared. Its orientation is also accurate. It is however, slightly oversized.--- be aware that low resolution imagery can make things appear larger than they actually are and squaring can change the size of the shape you've drawn.--- Overall a good changeset. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155138024

Welome to OSM. This building footprint is valid and the general shape looks to be correct or close to it, however you should press q after tagging to square the corners of features when appropriate. It is difficult to hand draw exact right angles. The building height appears to be invalid based on imagery and it contradicts the building levels tag value of 5. At least one those values is wrong.---You should only contribute to OSM based on sources with a compatible licence; as far as I'm aware google maps and earth do not fall into this category, and so you should not use them when contributing to OSM.--- Thank you for your contribution, please keep this in mind in future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158564514

Thank you for improving the accuracy of the highway in this area.--- Please just keep in mind that when you upload edits you should submit valid changeset comments. In this case you uploaded using the default comment that states you added buildings when you actually modified a highway. ---Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156097339

This footprint is a little oversized, but it is valid and the orientation is accurate. Leave yourself a margin for squaring when tracing features.--- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156147985

Welcome to OSM. The areas you add represent building footprints and so should represent individual buildings; not groups of them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156886486

In mapbox you can tell that the shape of WAY: 1313058180 is inaccurate, however I can see why you would map it this way looking at ESRI. Thank you for modifying the waterway in the way you did. By moving its nodes to new positions you did not create an unnecessary new version of the river.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156147960

The vast majority of buildings are valid and all are appropriately squared. Some are oversized like WAY: 1304896588. The image is taken at an oblique angle so you can see part of the wall (the building actually casts a shadow on its own wall). The roof should be mapped and then moved to the base of the building (where the wall meets the ground). You can see my changes in Changeset: 158523142. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154663143

It appears that you accidentally modified a highway causing the changeset to be much larger. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to nearby elements or filter them out using the map data panel. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301241

It appears that you accidentally modified a highway causing the changeset to be much larger. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to nearby elements or filter them out using the map data panel. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301241

Good choice of imagery. You identified waterways. Before uploading your changes check that the comment is appropriate; in this case you made no mention of mapping waterways. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301294

You made a good choice of imagery. This is a valid footprint. This footprint should be squared. Press q after tagging to do this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154289374

You correctly drew the way representing the river in the direction of flow. You can use topo maps to to verify this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301365

Press q to square building footprints after tagging. Avoid uploading untagged elements as they will not render in OSM. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301365

These footprints should be squared; press q after tagging. WAY: 1303255173 could be a tree becuase the shadow it casts is significantly larger than the adjacent buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301537

This footprint should be squared, because it is simply more likely to have square corners in reality than to have this shape. The imagery does not provide strong enough evidence that this building has this shape. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301610

Good job, the footprints you've correctly identified buildings in aerial imagery.---The buildings here could be more accurate and should be squared. Press q on your keyboard after tagging an area to do this. You can also see these buildings in mapbox. I rectifiec this in Changeset: 158513673.---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301645

I resolved this in changesets; 158509853 and 158511229.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156702668

The biggest problem here is the imagery you decided to use to digitize footprints, because many of these buildings are simply no longer there and so I have had to delete them and modify those who's shape has changed.--- In the imagery you used: All of the footprints are valid and footprints have been appropriately squared. On some occasions you even mapped footprints with more complex footprints.--- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156702668

All footprints are valid, and appropriately squared. The changeset comment is accurate. The accuracy of some footprints could be greater, but on the whole this is a good changeset.---
Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154396270

A better changeset comment would have been "I added a post office, events venue, and the highways that connect them to the broarder network." Places in OSM tagging refer to settlements like hamlets, villages, towns and cities, and so refering to the features that you added here as places could be confusing for users who only read your comment.