Flagged feature should be squared. I rectified this.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135116353

The flagged feature is not squared, but overall a good change-set.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135116225

If you want to move several features my a similar ammount you can filter the map data and use the shift key for a laso select function so that you can move them all simultaneously.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135116063

Adding the layer tag to the building footprint in this instance is not the correct way to resolve the overlapping features warning, though it seems that you are aware of that.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135115453

Once again, all good. It is also possible to modify the tags of the buildings you deleted to removed:building=house ,given the comment in change-set 40758463 indicating that this was a temporary dwelling. This tagging prevents others from adding it back to the map as so long as it is still visible in other imagery sources.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135115562

This footprint could be rotated clockwise a few degrees but this is minor. The footprnit is otherwise accurate and valid.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135115476

Pay no mind to my marking this change-set as bad. It helps OSMCha to better detect errors. I see that you have rectified this problem in a future change-set, likely that one will be marked as good. When adding elements in the iD editor you can hold a keybind to prevent snapping/ the creation of common nodes. Press h or ? for a list of the keybinds.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135115453

Fantastic! All deletions are valid, all modifications improve the accuracy of building footprints, all additions are valid and accurate. You could have modified WAY: 1163947168 insted of deleting it, but seeing as you created it yourself a few minutes earlier it doesn't really cause any harm. Again it would be nice if you included something like 'deleted buildings which are no longer visible in mre recent imagery'. Thank you!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135115254

Thank you for providing the source of information. Please also provide the method of how the geometry was aquired. e.g. if it was traced with aerial imagery, then also provide that information. It makes it easier to identify the feature by cross referencing imagery, and determining when its lifecycle prefix should be modified, and when the feature should be deleted.

The building footprint appears accurate and correctly squared, I cannot verify the highway becasue I do not have access to the imagery you used to digitize it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135114659

Well done! You correctly identified that more recent imagery provided sufficient evidence to delete these features, given the date at which the data was uploaded following a survey sometime before 2016-07-15. Please add a comment to your change-set so that others can more easily understand what you've done.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135115025

flagged features not squared.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134259959

It is good that you moved these buildings instead of deleting them. The one in the NE is moved to align to esri imagery but the SW one looks like it was mapped with an offset. The building in the Ne is L shaped and the SW one is T shaped.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153778653

All buildings are identified and squared correctly, good job. Building footprints do not have correct geometry e.g. WAY: 1182411249, WAY: 1182411250, WAY: 1182411251, WAY: 1182411254, WAY: 1182411255 are either T or L shaped buildings, not simply quadrilaterals.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137401353

The building footprints are all correctly squared, save one. You may modify a highway that overlaps with a building footprint. when you do so please state so in your change-set comment.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137399983

The flagged features should be squared. You have correctly identified buildings in the imagery but their shape and orientation is not alwats accurate. Zooming out can actually help you see the shaped and orientation of buildings.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137399667

All building footprints in this change-set represent buildings in imagery, good job.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153961009

You correctly identified all buildings in this change-set, well done.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153961183

Try to stick to your task area and keep uploads logically and spacially consistent. Please square buildings after tagging them in iD editor. Press h or ? for a list of keybinds and shortcuts.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153961009

The imagery source you provided seems incorrect.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137401971