Building footprints are inaccurate. WAY: 1286841090 is actually L shaped,
WAY: 1286841097 is T shaped, and WAY: 1286841080 envelopes multiple buildings.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151858337

Building footprints are inaccurate. WAY: 1286850539 is too small, WAY: 1286850540 is too big.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151860085

Just a heads up, you added Esri World Imagery and Esriworldimagery to your sources
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151805208

Building footprints are square and accurate. Well done!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151805208

Most of these footprints are inaccurate in one way or another. WAY: 1286468996 & WAY: 1286468986 are quite accurate: please map more like that in the future.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151793515

Building footprints inaccurate, particularly the southern one. It's aspect ratio is off and it appears oversized.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151841518

Also while I'm here these building footprints are obviously not square please press q when adding square buildings. Some of these footprints envelope multiple buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151804884

you also modified a highway in this change-set. Please include all the changes you make in the comment so that it's not misleading. I'm validating on the project you contributed to and this makes it seem as though you were mapping roads in another task area. A better comment would be "I added buildings, and moved highways to prevent overlaps".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151804884

Building footprints inaccurate; Multiple buildings mapped using one footprint, redundant nodes in footprints, etc.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151762971

Building footprints inaccurate.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151788237

Building footprints inaccurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151794730

Building footprints could have been more accurate, given the quality of the imagery.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151845779

Golo Ronggot 'village' node is located in trees, and not a population centre

I verified this change-set as bad for the following reasons;
1. Using aerial imagery you mapped what should be interpreted as multiple buildings using only one footprint.
2. Building footprints are inaccurate. They are usually not well aligned with imagery, many "T" and "L" shaped buildings are mapped as simply quadrelatirals, The size and orientation is not always correct. e.g. WAY: 1286466796 is actually T shaped, and WAY: 1286466761should be L shaped.
3. Buildings you added contain excess nodes with no additional tags e.g. WAY: 1286466746.

I have left further comments in the HOT TM project and task this was mapped on [task 7](https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/16807/tasks?search=7) they go beyond the scope of this change-set.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151793267

This place=village node is currently in a river, and not a population centre. Is there a good reason for this, or was the import of this node just not checked?

The geometry of the building to the NW of this changeset is inaccurate. The building's roof has a bright and shaded part. This is becuase the sun is shining from the North as can be confirmed by the shadows being cast Southward. The footprint you mapped also contains the building's shadow. Buildings can cast shadows on their own walls, but I don't think that is the case in this imagery: it is the easten wall that can be seen.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151845904

The schoolhouse footprint is a little oversized. That dark bit to the west of the building is one of its walls. The building is casting a shadow on that wall, since the shadows are being cast NNW. You can play around with the imagery settings like brightness/gamma to hopefully help you see it. In this case you should draw the roof outline, and then move it so that its corners line up with where the building's corners meet the ground. I uploaded this change-set as an example of what the final result looks like. changeset/152962551
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152921299

In that case I think the way to link those two buildings properly is through a relation becuase, landuse=education or simmilar tags on an area surrounding both of them wouldn't be accurate. Relations are not the easiest things to edit in ID I believe (at least not this kind) so just mapping the buildings is good.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152917846

Feel free to increase the size of your changesets to something like 10 features, or so. So long as the features are close to one another, and the change-set comment, and source etc. applies to all of them i.e. they're logically linked in some way and it doesn't take you more than say 15 minutes to map. e.g. the recent change-sets you uploaded regarding Riverside Deli and Roots Hair Salon. They're both on the same street (proximity), and you're adding their addresses, and business information to the nodes/POIs (repeating the same actions/logical link). Those two change-sets could have been uploaded as one. Then you don't have to write comments and add all the extra info as often, and they'll still be understandable by others.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152921763

By all means feel free to add the storage building. Just map it with a seperate footprint. Otherwise it would look like one big building on the map. This schoolhouse is no longer used for teaching, correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152917846