OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
152916152 over 1 year ago

Good practice when submitting changeset comments is to include the location of the feature you edited, for example the country and city, or state. It can help other mappers keep track of local edits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152916152

152916133 over 1 year ago

It is accurate to delete features that no longer exist. Your change-set comment is informative: thank you for submitting one. It's also good that you included a source. Just know that local knowlege can refer to things like 'my friend told me that a resturaunt I know of shut down', If you have actually seen for yourself that the buisness is no longer opperational, then you can state your source as "survey" instead which carries more credence.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152916133

151274695 over 1 year ago

Why did you revert and modify these building footprints?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151274695

150012776 over 1 year ago

a significant portion of way/531395324 is a waterway. you added a highway across it but not the bridge/culvert. other crossings should be marked as ford=yes. The waterway is intermittent
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150012776

150012776 over 1 year ago

The highway-highway crossing warning simply means that highways are intersecting and do not share a common node.

150012776 over 1 year ago

This is not the correct way to use the crossing key. The key is intended to mark the crossing of ways with varying traffic e.g. a train and a motor vehicle. Different values of highway sharing a node do not count, intersecting ways intended for the same transport mode do not count: these are junctions. Reference osm.wiki/Crossings.

151886895 over 1 year ago

Please, write a changeset comment before the hashtags. Intersecting highways must share a common node unless they are on seperate layers i.e. physically seperated, one above the other.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151886895

151886662 over 1 year ago

Highway junctions must share a common node. Please, write a changeset comment before the hashtags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151886662

151886526 over 1 year ago

The nothern way you added created a highway/highway overlap. Please add ways accurately. Please write a changeset comment stating what you did before the hashtags
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151886526

151885821 over 1 year ago

You created highway/highway overlaps without common nodes. Please write a changeset comment (ideally before the hashtags).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151885821

151885450 over 1 year ago

You created intersecting highways which do not share common nodes. Navigational software may/will not recognise the junction and so will not route correctly or in the most efficient way. The highways should be better alligned to imagery.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151885450

151885725 over 1 year ago

You should not add highways (open ways) that share multiple consecutive nodes as this creates a ovelapping ways error.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151885725

151887341 over 1 year ago

You moved a node to a less accurate location so I reverted your change set. It looks like a mouse slip. Please keep your edits within a task area and leave a changeset comment at the begining of your changeset.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151887341

151517691 over 1 year ago

I was unaware of that, thanks for letting me know. I'll keep it in mind for the future.

I was going off of the public_transport=platform page on the OSM wiki when mapping: it stated that the area tag was not required. It does however, conradict the platform=railway page ,which states that the area tag is necessary.

If you know more about it and want to spread the word you may wish to edit or add to the OSM wiki pages, and/or inform someone responsible for the rendering of the map (if this is in fact a bug).

150539895 over 1 year ago

woods and buildings should not share common nodes press g on them and pull them apart. press q to square corners. I reccomend you return to this area and just look around using esri imaging to learn how to better interpret the shape of buildings in imagery. it has better resolution at high zoom. Check out this wiki page too osm.wiki/Roof_modelling
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150539895

150585008 over 1 year ago

Nodes should not be shared by buildings and woods area press g on shared nodes to unglue them.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150585008

150585008 over 1 year ago

Square the corners of buildnigs that have square corners have a look here for more details about mapping buildings osm.wiki/Roof_modelling
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150585008

150392358 over 1 year ago

Thank you for mapping but please be aware that building footprints cannot physically overlap on the same layer. So even if you can't quite work out the arangment/shape of buildings. Know that they should not overlap. Please press q when mapping buildings with square corners.

150413378 over 1 year ago

Buildings in the changeset area and within the area of task https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/16641/tasks/?search=1108 have not been mapped before you marked the task as complete.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150413378

150412477 over 1 year ago

Orthogonolise building footprints by pressing 'q' for buildings with straight edges.
Upload a change set/ save your progress after a handfull of additions/changes/deletions. Submit a comment along with your changeset(when saving your progress in ID Editor) stating what you have done (since the previous save), and where appropriate why. This will mitigate the loss of your work and make your changesets easier to understand and therefore utilise.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150412477