Gppes's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 52717608 | over 7 years ago | Danke, ich werde die Tour bis zum Hiaslegg wieder mal durch rauf fahren, und dann schauen, ob sich was geaendert hat. Nachdem Du aber vor Ort warst, habe ich nicht vor da "umzukrempeln". Danke + lg, Gppes |
| 52717608 | over 7 years ago | Hi, you updated some road details on Roetzstrasse (smoothness, width, lanes) have you actually been there? I was there with my bike yesterday, doesn't look as bad as your tags may indicate the situation there!? Lg, Gppes |
| 60073136 | over 7 years ago | In der Tat, der wurde professionell wiederaufgearbeitet. Die Forststrasse wurde mit dem Bagger zerstoert und es wurden Baeumchen gepflanzt... |
| 60073136 | over 7 years ago | fuer die Info, ich werde da mal einen Survey machen... |
| 60073136 | over 7 years ago | Danke |
| 49044832 | over 7 years ago | I found another way here: 496451625 could you please state your sources? |
| 49044832 | over 7 years ago | Hi, the track (and others close by):
was tagged with "access=private" shouldn't it be "vehicle=forestry"? Lg, Gppes |
| 41253215 | over 7 years ago | Hallo, Danke fuer die Anmerkung, wir haben diese Woche OSM Stammtisch, da werden wir den Edit diskutieren, ein lokaler Mapper hat dort recherchiert... |
| 59445978 | over 7 years ago | Fuers Protokoll: Ich bin mit diesem Revert nicht einverstanden. EOD. |
| 41253215 | over 7 years ago | Hi, can you provide a source for the community centres? What is the purpose of this centres (community_centre:for=*)? Cheers, Gppes |
| 58483802 | over 7 years ago | Hi, what's the purpose of this two ways? Lg, Gppes |
| 56950893 | over 7 years ago | Thanks for your reply, sorry for bothering you! |
| 56950893 | over 7 years ago | Hi, people in the German forum are wondering about the German name of the following node (name:de=Brueckel) node/5460545204 Can you provide a source for that name? See the discussion here:
Greetings, Gppes |
| 57705945 | over 7 years ago | I hope I did not guess wrong, but you seem to be a user from Germany, that's way I opened a discussion here:
|
| 57705945 | over 7 years ago | Hi, to my opinion this is a mass edit to bend a github discussion on rendering castles in a certain direction. This edit should be reverted. |
| 57585688 | over 7 years ago | Hi, could you please clarify your intentions according to this changeset? Greetings from Austria! |
| 57554119 | over 7 years ago | Hi, thanks for your reply. I was referring to the single island with the way id: 573387988 this single island (only this specific case) was completely covered by water and contradicts this section in the wiki:
It wasn't my intention to say you shouldn't map islands at all, but it is possible, that for the specific case mentioned, your tagging is wrong. I found two errors you really should avoid (before continuing mapping islands):
Maybe you can solve the direction problem, by drawing the lines as if you were walking around the island so that the land _always_ is on your left side. After placing the first node think of sitting right at the place were you put the node and look to the direction, so that the land is on the left side and the sea is on the right side. Start "walking" to that direction and place the next nodes. I only know Josm, so I can't help you with Potlatch. In Josm the direction of the way only is displayed after selecting the way. Maybe it is the same with Potlatch. |
| 57554119 | almost 8 years ago | Another question, are you sure, that this "island" should be mapped? way id: 573387988, it probably contradicts the wiki (link above). |
| 57554119 | almost 8 years ago | Hi, your are creating a reasonable number of "coastline errors", they have quite an impact on rendering wide areas of the map! Have a look here:
Greetings from Austria, Gppes |
| 51853549 | almost 8 years ago | Hallo, dieser (und moeglicherweise andere) Changesets von Dir werden derzeit im oesterreichischen Forum diskutiert. Ein lokaler User hat vor Deinen Edits bereits Adressen eingetragen, wodurch jetzt vieles doppelt ist. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61805 Lg, Gppes This changeset of yours (and maybe others) caused duplicate addresses on buildings which already have been mapped by a local user. That's why we currently have a discussion about your edits in the Austrian forum:
|