OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
125032714 over 3 years ago

I would suggest using the tags leisure=fitness_centre + sport=yoga. This will help more people find the yoga studio than tagging it as a religion. Currently there are over 3,000 yoga studios tagged this way. Let me know if you need help. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125032714

124872333 over 3 years ago

Thanks for the info and glad to see that you read the wiki.

124997715 over 3 years ago

#TIP: Instead of deleting the existing outline, just modify the existing one to match the current imagery. This saves the history of the object.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124997715

124929540 over 3 years ago

I am going to revert this edit. This location is an apartment complex so it's unlikely to contain a contractor business. If you disagree, please provide information showing that this is a business with an address that can be verified.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124929540

124907845 over 3 years ago

#TIP: when adding a business besides the name, add the type of business. For example the iHop would be amenity=restaurant. There is a name suggest index in the tagging preset that has many of national chains included. Tagging presets can be found in the preferences, F12.

I did add the tags for the iHop to show what can be easily done.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124907845

124872333 over 3 years ago

Not sure why you removed the parking_aisle tag. They look like parking aisles, with parking on one or both sides of the way.

Can you review your edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124872333

124863444 over 3 years ago

The driveway appears to exist. Since it can be seen, I've added it back. If you disagree, can you confirm that the driveway doesn't exist anymore?

In OSM, if the object exist it can be added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124863444

124405130 over 3 years ago

At some point i suspect the abandoned railways will be moved to OpenHistoricalMap.org . But they can be useful for planners for new trails. Right now in Skagit County the PUD is using them for a new 16" water pipeline and soon a new segment of the Centennial Trails. Obviously if they wanted to use the land on your property they would have to negotiate with you. Or just take it as counties can do. Let's hope that don't happen
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124405130

124405130 over 3 years ago

This is what it looks like after I removed the track from your property. osm.org/#map=17/47.39070/-121.40086. While the abandoned railway is still mapped, it doesn't appear on the map. While it is visible from imagery, it isn't routable for traffic. I would suggest adding no trespassing signs to both ends of the old rail bed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124405130

124800138 over 3 years ago

Please add the business as a node at their exact location. I've restored the service road to it's original tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124800138

124709178 over 3 years ago

We don't add businesses to streets. I'm going to have this edit reverted. If you need help editing OSM please contact me.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124709178

124405130 over 3 years ago

Take a look at the changes I made. I added back in the abandoned railway, removed the track to the south which doesn't appear on the imagery and removed some non-existent bldgs.

124539867 over 3 years ago

Thanks for the confirmation.

124539867 over 3 years ago

Question - are the sidewalks marked as private, ie no trespassing or are they justed owned by a private company? If they are privately owned but anyone can use them then the access tag isn't needed. If they are marked as no-trespassing then the tag is appropriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124539867

124485717 over 3 years ago

#TIP: We spell out street names in OSM - the reason is software has a hard time un-abbreviating.

Also - the US doesn't really have any living streets. According to the county, it is likely a driveway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124485717

124405130 over 3 years ago

Unfortunately the track is visible from background imagery so it's likely to just be added back. A better solution is to mark the track as access=no or access=private. That prevents routers from using the segment.

Also, the is an abandoned railway bed that should be preserved. Abandoned railway beds have been used for other projects. For example, near me they are using it for a new water pipeline.

Can you review your edits and if you agree, add the track and abandoned railway back? Let me know if you have any questions. I'll send you more info in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124405130

124310983 over 3 years ago

Question - it looks like Boone Road splits on the right into two different roads. Should the one that goes to the parking area be tagged as highway=service?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124310983

124310865 over 3 years ago

#TIP: unclassified roads are typically rural residential streets. These should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Can you update your edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124310865

124289724 over 3 years ago

#TIP: when adding multiple units, create a node for each individual unit. Place the node near the front door but inside of the building outline.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124289724

124289529 over 3 years ago

#TIP: background imagery usually has different offsets. You can manually adjust the imagery using the background layer in the editor. It possible that the original imagery was also offset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124289529