Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 113764182 | about 4 years ago | Mapping sidewalks serve a very useful purpose, providing routing for pedestrians, especially those with limited mobility (using a wheelchair) Check out https://opensidewalks.com and https://accessmap.io. Both of these efforts are the result of work done by the UW Taskar Center for Accessible Technology. The OSM wiki also contains instructions for mapping sidewalks as separate ways. Both can coexist. I'm going to revert your edits. I'll send you more information on OSM in a message. Feel free to contact me with your concerns.
|
| 113764182 | about 4 years ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
| 113750326 | about 4 years ago | Have you considered a super relation of the two parts? Check out osm.wiki/Super-relation. Can you fix relatively quickly? The name Columbia River 2 is obviously wrong. |
| 113741012 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: highway classification is based on the UK's system of classification since OSM was started in the UK. highway=unclassified is basically a rural residential road. The driveway should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. #TIP: We don't use descriptive names like name=Driveway. Can you fix up the driveway? Let me know if you need help.
|
| 113750326 | about 4 years ago | I'm confused. Why did you name the river in the relation as Columbia River 2, when the waterway is the Columbia River?
|
| 113716796 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: In addition to the name, it good to add in the type of business. It could be a school or office from the sound of the name. Check wiki.openstreetmap.org for more help.
|
| 113663119 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: Square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 112959560 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 113636264 | about 4 years ago | Old abandoned and razed lines might be better in OpenHistoricalMaps.org. If there was some trace existence then OSM would be appropriate but since this line is completely gone, I don't think it fits here.
|
| 113621062 | about 4 years ago | To split the way, just create a node where you want the break, then right click and use the scissors to split the way. Questions - even though this is private land, how do you know the owner didn't give permission for the path? |
| 113621062 | about 4 years ago | I don't know if you did, but you might ask both of the prior mappers why they added opening hours. Both Adam Schneider and skquinn are current active mappers with a good reputation.
|
| 113616557 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 113557815 | about 4 years ago | Landuse=grass isn't appropriate for a golf green. A typical green should be tagged as golf=green. See leisure=golf_course
|
| 113540937 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: Save and upload your edits before moving to a distant location.
|
| 113500469 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: Strava heatmaps can be used. Check out the instructions osm.wiki/Strava. Note it's a bit of a pain since the strava keypairs only work for a week or so and then must be renewed. But if the trail is heavily traveled, it gives must better resolution than a single gpx trace.
|
| 113501305 | about 4 years ago | You changed a Shell Food Mart to a Jacksons. I don't believe we have any of the Jackson's convenience stories in the area. Where are you getting your information? Are you familiar with this area?
|
| 113465542 | about 4 years ago | We usually enter street addresses with NE as Northeast. Can you fix?
|
| 113465553 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 113430145 | about 4 years ago | I removed the hospital tag and added a healthcare clinic tag instead. We don't want people rushing to what they think is a hospital when it isn't.
|
| 113430145 | about 4 years ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|