Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163216636

I removed some of what you did. The secondary highway is likely a service road. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. You may want to read the wiki on how to map features.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163208815

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

This appears to be all fictitious. I'm reverting it. If you disagree, please let me know. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163148265

#TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbreviating.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163185207

A couple of issues - first the leveled land, should like be tagged as landuse=brownfield instead of using a descriptive name. The fence tag is appropriate.

Also the trail you added, stops just short of SE 41st Dr. Should it connect? Also, this looks like private property. Is there a public path there? The owners may be concerned if people start walking on their property.

Not sure why your removed the highway=residential tag from NE 126th Ct, but I added it back.

Also you added a duplicate driveway, house and shed. I removed the duplicates. Also, we don't use descriptive names, like Shed or Driveway, instead tag them appropriately, for example highway=service + service=driveway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163146399

You should check out the wiki for how to map pedestrian ways. For example, the crossing:island is typically a node at the island, though I have drawn it as a way, but just for the island. See crossing:island=*.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163098843

Looks like you acidentially extended NE 71st St next to and old path. I've removed the path.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163075569

Why the access=destination? access=destination is typically used on private property to allow people to get to a destination. I don't think I've ever seen it in public spaces.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163020462

We typically do not remove informal trails, instead we mark them as informal and access=no. Could you review your edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163020191

Just to let you know the park was already mapped.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163015405

i have reverted this edit. This is not what the community has agreed on. Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 and osm.wiki/Gulf_of_Mexico before editing the name of this feature. Undiscussed changes will be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163066760

i have reverted this edit. This is not what the community has agreed on. Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 and osm.wiki/Gulf_of_Mexico before editing the name of this feature. Undiscussed changes will be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163066448

I'd probably go ahead and rename it Davis Peak Road unless it's signed. Many of the roads in the Cascade mountains are from very old data, and likely wrong.

I restored the road but made it a track. I also noticed from the website you referenced, Davis Peak Road is named PH-1000. Though I know many of these roads have duplicate names. Can you confirm that it is called Davis Peak Road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918558

I could not find any records of the road in the counties data. Doesn't show on bing imagery or lidar map so I removed it. If there is a road there it may just be a track. unclassified is like a residential road in rural areas.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918558

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918365

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918326

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918247

I would also add that the editor can remove the object but save the address. Just copy the buildings tags to a node, then use right click on use the downgrade tool to remove excess tags, leaving just the address.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162876528