Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502253

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

It looks like you moved an address from the correct location. See https://gisweb.jeffcowa.us/LandRecords/ for address data. Can you fix this? Let me know if you need assistance.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502010

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501781

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501066

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163497081

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163497013

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163496976

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163496953

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good with the exception of descriptive names. We do not use descriptive names in OSM. Instead, find a tag that best describes the feature. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163466820

There is no road across 101. Reverting
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422261

Also a trunk. Reverting.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422488

Same again. It's not even a divided highway. reverting.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422475

This is also a trunk. Reverting.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422444

The local community has agreed that this is a trunk. I'm going to revert.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422417

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion. Try not to connect the trail to the park landuse. If either change, it requires disconnecting nodes.

Also, Is this a trail or more like a gravel sidewalk? OSM, which started in England, uses British English terms. So a path lis like a trail and a footway is more like a sidewalk. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163378278

A couple of questions. You tagged a house on E. Mill Plain Blvd as a place of worship. It looks more like a plain house. Is it really a place of worship, or maybe the pastors house?

Also you tagged two house as tourism=apartment. I think a better way is to tag it as building=apartments. There building just for tourism so it you may be correct. We just don't see that many.

Can you review this edits? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163229741

It is my understanding that there must be some sort of barrier between ways before the way is separated. See osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway. I just drove over it yesterday and I don't recall seeing any barriers. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163306481

Those signs indicate that the road is privately owned and maintained. The correct tag would be ownership=private. Unless there is a no trespassing sign, the access=private should not be used. access=destination might be appropriate. Can you review this edit? Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163289956

That does not look like a meadow?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163231910

Why did you remove building that are still shown on imagery?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163231539