#TIP: in the future just remove the business and not the address. The address will likely be reused by another shop.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159585779

Thanks for adding the bridge support. You might also want to move the abandoned railway to match the imagery and added the bridge.

Also, leaving good changeset comments is helpful to you and others. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

FYI - your user name caught my attention. Google doesn't allow copying their data. Even from imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159576483

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. You might want to check the boundaries for the park. The county shows a larger area. See https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159561599

#TIP: the value for the colour= tag should be all lower case. Also the reference tag is typically a numeric value. See emergency=fire_hydrant for a whole lot of options. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159556836

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159555303

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159521272

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159521287

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159521272

DWG - Google does not allow use of their maps for improving OSM. Please do not do so in the future. The 3 changesets that have google as a source will be redacted. See osm.wiki/Google for more information.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159521272

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I'm reverting this changeset. Please do not vandalize OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159445645

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

The building looks good, but I'm not sure what exactly you did with the roundabout. Can you explain?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159438028

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159437948

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159437426

To make a circle object, just draw a rough circle, then type an "o" and you'll have a perfect circle. Also, water towers are tagged as man_made=water_tower. tagging helps to easily identify objects. Can you update this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159417287

I would be helpful to other users and yourself to add a brief changeset comment when you upload edits. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more help writing changeset comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159392254

same multipolygon issue with Lake Dawn. I fixed this one as an example.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159376803

Because there is a lake in the middle of your woods polygon, the lake rendering is a combination of lake and woods. A better way is to add the lake as an inner polygon to the wooded area. I also notice, not all of the area is wooded, especially just north of the lake. Multipolygons are more difficult so if you need help, you might check out osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon.

Can you review this edit to improve it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159376406

Because there is a lake in the middle of your woods polygon, the lake rendering is a combination of lake and woods. A better way is to add the lake as an inner polygon to the wooded area. I also notice, not all of the area is wooded, especially just north of the lake. Multipolygons are more difficult so if you need help, you might check out osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon.

Can you review this edit to improve it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159376406

Because there is a lake in the middle of your woods polygon, the lake rendering is a combination of lake and woods. A better way is to add the lake as an inner polygon to the wooded area. I also notice, not all of the area is wooded, especially just north of the lake. Multipolygons are more difficult so if you need help, you might check out osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon.

Can you review this edit to improve it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159376406

Please do not remove features unless you know they do not exist anymore.

Glassman
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155702973